[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status of d-i 2.4.27/2.6.8 kernel transition



On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:22:57AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I wondered what was the status of switching d-i to the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8

Thanks for folllowing up on this.

> arch	linux-kernel-di	build/config		rootskel	 base-installer
> i386	2.4.27/2.6.8	2.4.27/2.6.8/2.4.26 [1]	2.4.26/2.6.7 [6] 
> alpha	2.4.27		2.4.26 [2]				 2.4.26
> amd64	2.6.8		2.6.8
> arm	2.4.27		2.4.27
> hppa	2.4.25 [3]	2.4.25 [3]		2.4.20 [7]	 2.4.26 [10]
> ia64	2.4.27/2.6.8	2.4.27/2.6.8		2.4.25 [8]
> m68k	2.2.25/2.4.27	2.2.25/2.4.26 [4]
> mips	2.4.27		2.4.27
> mipsel	2.4.27		2.4.27
> powerpc	2.4.27/2.6.8	2.4.27/2.6.8				 2.4.25/2.6.7 [11]

Mmm, i suppose we need a base-installer modification here, right ? 

>    apus	2.4.25 [5]	2.4.25 [5]				 2.4.25

Well, the apus kernel doesn't boot on Simon's apus hardware, which is the only
one who tested this, but i will see if i wipe up a 2.4.27 kernel for apus. The
apus patches in the apus CVS are upto 2.4.26 only though.

> s390	2.4.27		2.4.27			2.4.21 [9]
> sparc	2.4.27/2.6.8	2.4.27

So, basically, as far as only kernels are concerned :

  2.4.25 still present on : hppa, partly m68k and powerpc/apus.

Apus has no 2.4.27 kernels in the archive, but as far as i am concerned, we
can just drop it and solve this issue. I will try to do a 2.4.27 kernel
though, for completeness, and because i haven't lost hope that Simon will be
able to fix the issues, which seems more boot-loader related than kernels
related.

Are there already 2.4.27 hppa kernels .debs in the archive ? And what is the
m68k situation with regard to 2.4.27 kernels again in .debs and not .udebs.

All in all, i think the situation is less problematic than it feared, at least
as far as kernel .debs go.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: