Bug#261471: marked as done (netcfg-dhcp.templates: change 'may work' to 'may succeed')
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id <E1Bzsy3-0001tm-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#261471: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 07:51:11 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Mon Jul 26 00:51:10 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bp0GM-00007K-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:51:10 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.193.193 with login)
by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 07:51:10 -0000
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AF1172DEFE; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:51:09 -0700
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-l10n-french@lists.debian.org
Subject: netcfg-dhcp.templates: change 'may work' to 'may succeed'
Message-ID: <20040726075109.GN23921@triplehelix.org>
Mail-Followup-To: joshk@triplehelix.org, submit@bugs.debian.org,
debian-l10n-french@lists.debian.org
References: <200407251513.24554.gerard@delafond.org> <20040725165334.GC1532@clalis> <20040726063748.GG6108@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m0vRWufqUC70IDnR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040726063748.GG6108@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: joshk@triplehelix.org (Joshua Kwan)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--m0vRWufqUC70IDnR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: netcfg-dhcp
Severity: minor
Version: 0.72
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 08:37:48AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > =AB > cela peut marcher
> > =AB=20
> > =AB Argh !! Fonctionner !
> >=20
> > Quoi ! vous vous offusquez d'une pauvre m=E9taphore ?!
> > Elle est comme un clin d'oeil...
>=20
> Je pense que c'est le cot=E9 "language parl=E9" qui gene G=E9rard, et je
^^^^
> suis d'accord avec lui.
Christian connait mieux l'anglais que le fran=E7ais.. :)
> Cela =E9tant, l'original n'est pas l'id=E9al non plus et il me semble
> qu'on avait dit avec joshk qu'on le r=E9=E9crirait pour du moins trivial
> ("this may work" c'est moyen-moyen).
Je viens de parler avec Christian dans IRC =E0 propos de ce template.
apr=E8s le beta5/tc2 je changerai 'may work' =E0 'may succeed', et alors
je crois que 'cela peut marcher' changerait =E0 'cela peut r=E9ussir'?
Bien s=FBr, Philippe va choisir la bonne traduction..
Est-ce que =E7a va?
(Pour me rappeler de cette conclusion je vais cr=E9er un bug wishlist sur
netcfg-dhcp, que je fermerai apr=E8s beta5/tc2)
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--m0vRWufqUC70IDnR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=CJ3y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--m0vRWufqUC70IDnR--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 08:23:22 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Wed Aug 25 01:23:22 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bzt3x-0008TR-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 01:23:21 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bzsy3-0001tm-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: 261471-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#261471: fixed in netcfg 1.01
Message-Id: <E1Bzsy3-0001tm-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
Delivered-To: 261471-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 1.01
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.01.dsc
netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
netcfg_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.01_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 261471@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org> (supplier of updated netcfg package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:18:18 -0700
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.01
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Description:
netcfg - Configure the network (udeb)
netcfg-dhcp - Configure the network via DHCP (udeb)
netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 261460 261471 261527 263187 264476 265651 266245 266549 266641
Changes:
netcfg (1.01) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Joey Hess
- Ignore failure from ip in dhclient-script when setting mtu, in case
the supplied mtu is invalid.
* Joshua Kwan
- Give the user a choice to leave the network unconfigured if nothing is
plugged in. (Closes: #264476)
- netcfg-dhcp.templates: "may work" becomes "may succeed".
(Closes: #261471)
- Remove completely braindamaged pointer handling in
seed_hostname_from_dns, caused by myself.
(Closes: #261460, #261527, #263187, #265651, #266245, #266549)
- Don't let a positive result from mii-diag override netcfg/disable_dhcp.
(Closes: #266641)
* Updated translations:
- Arabic (ar.po) by Christian Perrier
- Catalan (ca.po) by Jordi Mallach
- Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure
- Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
- Greek (el.po) by Greek Translation Team
- Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
- Finnish (fi.po) by Tapio Lehtonen
- French (fr.po) by French Team
- Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
- Hungarian (hu.po) by VER�K István
- Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
- Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu
- Lithuanian (lt.po) by KÄ?stutis BiliÅ«nas
- Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
- Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André LuÃs Lopes
- Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
- Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor
- Russian (ru.po) by Christian Perrier
- Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann
- Swedish (sv.po) by Per Olofsson
- Turkish (tr.po) by Recai OktaÅ?
- Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
Files:
815b2bbc10e53e26569c80c2bd6963c8 1561 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.01.dsc
8478161435950c9e308493e4612352ee 196532 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
55790fb91ebf9a404fac6fcb7813c050 151910 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.01_i386.udeb
e700d5fa77e9abf805186635dc7e8a69 118272 debian-installer optional netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
a57eec7dbf8b76a4a016677df797b8c9 116794 debian-installer optional netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=zA6J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: