Bug#261531: marked as done (IP Address Statement)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:36:15 +0200
with message-id <1092764174.5216.115.camel@localhost.localdomain>
and subject line Won't implement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 15:50:07 +0000
>From disposable@wisdomwords.org Mon Jul 26 08:50:07 2004
Return-path: <disposable@wisdomwords.org>
Received: from host19.christianwebhost.com [209.239.33.53]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bp7jr-0006yr-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:50:07 -0700
Received: from lightning (12-216-240-89.client.mchsi.com [12.216.240.89])
by host19.christianwebhost.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6QFo6Ah013239
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:50:06 -0400
Message-ID: <007501c47328$38e9a9a0$870a0a0a@lightning>
From: <disposable@wisdomwords.org>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: IP Address Statement
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:50:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0072_01C472FE.4FD05710"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_40_50,
HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C472FE.4FD05710
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: Sarge Debian Linux for i386
Version: ?
Sorry I'm not being very descriptive...I'm *very* new to the Linux =
thing. I just wanted to say that I downloaded the =
sarge-i386-netinst.iso at =
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040724/
24-Jul-2004 23:25 112M =20
and when I was running through the installer, when it asked for the ip =
address, it said it was four numbers seperated by periods. For a newbie =
home user, it might be better stated as 4 SETS of numbers seperated by =
periods, each set being 1-3 numbers long. Just a suggestion...
Thanks!
CoolATIGuy
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C472FE.4FD05710
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Package: Sarge Debian Linux for i386</DIV>
<DIV>Version: ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sorry I'm not being very =
descriptive...I'm *very*=20
new to the Linux thing. I just wanted to say that I downloaded the =
<A=20
href=3D"http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040724=
/sarge-i386-netinst.iso"><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" =
size=3D3>sarge-i386-netinst.iso</FONT></A> at=20
</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040724=
/">http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040724/</A>=
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>24-Jul-2004 23:25 112M </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and when I was running through the =
installer, when=20
it asked for the ip address, it said it was four numbers seperated by=20
periods. For a newbie home user, it might be better stated as 4 =
SETS of=20
numbers seperated by periods, each set being 1-3 numbers long. =
Just a=20
suggestion...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>CoolATIGuy</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C472FE.4FD05710--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261531-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 17:35:42 +0000
>From jdthood@aglu.demon.nl Tue Aug 17 10:35:42 2004
Return-path: <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bx7s5-00088g-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:35:42 -0700
Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([82.161.38.140]:64065 helo=localhost)
by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bx7s4-000KLd-KE
for 261531-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:35:40 +0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8EE10D6D2
for <261531-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:36:15 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Won't implement
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
To: 261531-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1092764174.5216.115.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:36:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 261531-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
123 is a number as much as 3 is. There is room for clarification
but the installer is now in a string freeze so this won't be changed.
--
Thomas Hood
Reply to: