Bug#265381: marked as done (installation report)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:55:05 +0200
with message-id <200408130055.05507.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#265381: installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 22:29:40 +0000
>From johan@ehnberg.net Thu Aug 12 15:29:40 2004
Return-path: <johan@ehnberg.net>
Received: from fep30-0.kolumbus.fi (fep30-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvO4p-0003WV-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:29:40 -0700
Received: from [80.186.221.71] by fep30-app.kolumbus.fi with ESMTP
id <20040812222937.DVUC23396.fep30-app.kolumbus.fi@[80.186.221.71]>
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:29:37 +0300
Message-ID: <[🔎] 411BEF54.4090609@ehnberg.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:29:40 +0300
From: Johan Ehnberg <johan@ehnberg.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040810 Debian/1.7.2-2
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation report
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: <RC1, 2004-08-12>
uname -a: <Linux shadowserve 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:00:49 JST
2004 i686 GNU/Linux>
Date: <Fri Aug 13 01:18:51 EEST 2004>
Method: <netinst CD, normal install, defaults>
Machine: <HP Vectra VLi8>
Processor: 500 MHz PIII
Memory: 512 SDRAM
Root Device: <80 Gb IDE, /dev/hda>
Root Size/partition table: <
/dev/hda2 1,8G 313M 1,4G 19% /
tmpfs 126M 0 126M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 30M 6,8M 22M 25% /boot
/dev/hda4 73G 33G 37G 48% /opt
/dev/hdb1 38G 18G 21G 46% /home/teta
/dev/hdc1 38G 18G 21G 46% /opt/backup/teta
>
Output of lspci:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host
bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP
bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:04.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
0000:00:04.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
0000:00:04.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
0000:00:04.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
0000:00:10.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX
[Cyclone] (rev 24)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G200
AGP (rev 03)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
<I didn't get to choose which kernel would be installed. That probably
required booting with linux26 or expert. The kernel installed was ok,
but for 386. Autodetect my 686 so I don't have install it later (ok I
know, CD space limited). The questions asked were good; not too many,
irrelevant or difficult. A control freak like me should have used
expert, but I wanted to see how easy it can get. Thank you guys!>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 22:55:37 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Thu Aug 12 15:55:37 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvOTx-000623-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:55:37 -0700
Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BvOTS-0000ts-00
for <265381-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:55:06 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 265381-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#265381: installation report
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:55:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
References: <[🔎] 411BEF54.4090609@ehnberg.net>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 411BEF54.4090609@ehnberg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408130055.05507.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 265381-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Friday 13 August 2004 00:29, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> <I didn't get to choose which kernel would be installed. That probably
> required booting with linux26 or expert. The kernel installed was ok,
> but for 386. Autodetect my 686 so I don't have install it later (ok I
> know, CD space limited). The questions asked were good; not too many,
> irrelevant or difficult. A control freak like me should have used
> expert, but I wanted to see how easy it can get. Thank you guys!>
The reason you got the 386 kernel is that there is no 686 kernel available on
the netinst CD image.
If you had used the businesscard CD image or e.g. the netboot installation
method, the list of available kernels would have been downloaded from the
archives and the correct one selected.
A complete selection of kernels should also be included on the full CD sets.
You are correct that a list of available kernels will be shown if you install
at a lower priority.
Thank you very much for your report.
FJP
Reply to: