[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#260396: PowerMac G3 (beige) sarge d-i (18 July 2004) Installation Report using 2.6 kernel



On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:56, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:44:18PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > On (20/07/04 15:14), Colin Watson wrote:
> > > OK, we can fix that. Just to confirm, can you show me the output of the
> > > following two commands on that system:
> > > 
> > >   ls -l "/proc/device-tree$(cat /proc/device-tree/aliases/mac-io)/bmac"
> > > 
> > >   find "/proc/device-tree$(cat /proc/device-tree/aliases/mac-io)" -type f -name compatible | xargs grep bmac
> > > 
> > > If the second command gives you a filename, I'd also like to see what's
> > > in the device_type file in the same directory.
> > 

This thread got a bit side-tracked and the output of these commands
never got sent.  I've got a beige g3 running debian sarge, and I tried
them on it.  Here's the output:

$ ls -l "/proc/device-tree$(cat /proc/device-tree/aliases/mac-io)/bmac"
total 14
-r--r--r--  1 root root  12 Aug 11 15:47 AAPL,address
-r--r--r--  1 root root   9 Aug 11 15:47 AAPL,connector
-r--r--r--  1 root root  12 Aug 11 15:47 AAPL,interrupts
-r--r--r--  1 root root   4 Aug 11 15:47 address-bits
-r--r--r--  1 root root   4 Aug 11 15:47 cell-id
-r--r--r--  1 root root   5 Aug 11 15:47 compatible
-r--r--r--  1 root root   8 Aug 11 15:47 device_type
-r--r--r--  1 root root 128 Aug 11 15:47 driver-descriptor
-r--r--r--  1 root root  24 Aug 11 15:47 driver-ist
-r--r--r--  1 root root   4 Aug 11 15:47 driver-ptr
-r--r--r--  1 root root   6 Aug 11 15:47 local-mac-address
-r--r--r--  1 root root   4 Aug 11 15:47 max-frame-size
-r--r--r--  1 root root   5 Aug 11 15:47 name
-r--r--r--  1 root root  24 Aug 11 15:47 reg
 
$ find "/proc/device-tree$(cat /proc/device-tree/aliases/mac-io)" -type
f -name compatible | xargs grep bmac
Binary file /proc/device-tree/pci/mac-io/bmac/compatible matches

$ cat /proc/device-tree/pci/mac-io/bmac/device_type 
network

Rick





Reply to: