[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255263: acknowledged by developer (Bug#255263: Fixed already)

Just tried installing again with 24 July testing image and sid image. Modprobe allowed me to detect my drive (as I mentioned in my last email) but it STILL LOCKS UP WHEN I TRY TO FORMAT THE EXT3 PARTITION! 

Any ideas as to why it's doing that?? This is getting very frustrating........

-Olek

At 11:33 PM 7/11/2004, you wrote:

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#255263: bug report,
which was filed against the discover1-data package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 255263-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 06:23:01 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Sun Jul 11 23:23:01 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BjuDN-0006J0-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:23:01 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.234.108 with login) 
  by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 06:23:00 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7]) 
        by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121C52DDC1;
        Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) 
        id 1BjuDL-0002jG-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:22:59 -0700
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:22:59 -0700
To: 255263-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: joeyh@debian.org
Subject: Bug#255263: Fixed already
Message-ID: <20040712062259.GA10480@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 255263-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Olek,

This bug has already been fixed in discover1-data, for your exact
device: however, the version in TC1 is one revision shy of the one which
included that fix.

If you want to test it out, you should use this image:

http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-net=
inst.iso

But it should enter sarge soon enough. Joey? Can you hint the latest
discover1-data in? It's nothing but good stuff.

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=vZ32
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--
Reply to: