[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#244974: marked as done ([sparc] [20040420] [netboot] Kernel panic during boot)



Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700
with message-id <20040717221107.GA19565@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line this has been solved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 22:03:39 +0000
>From todd@cartman.phys.psu.edu Tue Apr 20 15:03:37 2004
Return-path: <todd@cartman.phys.psu.edu>
Received: from thecave.phys.psu.edu (cartman.phys.psu.edu) [128.118.163.27] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BG3Kn-0004fB-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:03:17 -0700
Received: from cartman.phys.psu.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cartman.phys.psu.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3KM2Vi2021718
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400
Received: (from todd@localhost)
	by cartman.phys.psu.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3KM2VOq021716
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <todd@phys.psu.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation report: sparc ultra2
Message-ID: <20040420220231.GA21619@cartman.phys.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-OS: Linux of course :>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 4/20/2004 BETA 3 from:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/
uname -a: Did not get that far.  Similar box says: Linux metacognition
2.4.24-sparc64 #1 Fri Jan 30 18:32:22 EST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 4/20/2004 18:00 EST

Method: netboot from netboot/boot.img boot from console, not serial

Machine: Sun Ultra 2 Creator
Processor: Ultrasparc II 200mhz
Memory: 1gb
Root Device: scsi /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0
Root Size/partition table: didn't get that far
Output of lspci: no pci on this box

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [E]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Netboot died at init with Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init!

Last few messages were:
Freeing initrd memory: 1242k freed
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
Warning: Unable to open an initial console.
Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!
 Press L1-A to return to the boot prom


-- 
Todd Troxell <todd@phys.psu.edu>
PSU Physics NOC: 814.865.3024

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244974-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:08 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Sat Jul 17 15:11:08 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.186] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BlxOe-0006xd-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:08 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.193.193 with login)
  by smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:07 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CAA2DDC1
	for <244974-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BlxOd-00055t-00
	for <244974-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700
To: 244974-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: this has been solved
Message-ID: <20040717221107.GA19565@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 244974-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Todd,

We've solved this since long ago by not using the framebuffer on sparc.
It seems the drivers were not written to accomodate programs like bterm
(#237075).

If you try an install again it should work peachy, and because it's been
so long, you should file a new installation report.

Thanks

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=A8il
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--



Reply to: