Bug#247088: marked as done (Unable to boot beta4 on sparc (SunBlade 150))
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:55:02 -0700
with message-id <20040716225502.GA5774@mx.rackable.com>
and subject line verified fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2004 08:00:55 +0000
>From st.o@gmx.de Mon May 03 01:00:55 2004
Return-path: <st.o@gmx.de>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BKYNj-0007Jp-00; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:00:55 -0700
Received: (qmail 3281 invoked by uid 0); 3 May 2004 08:00:23 -0000
Received: from 195.34.178.4 by www3.gmx.net with HTTP;
Mon, 3 May 2004 10:00:23 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:00:23 +0200 (MEST)
From: "Stephan Orth" <st.o@gmx.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Package: installation-reports
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated: #577201
Message-ID: <29373.1083571223@www3.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040430 from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 200405030900
Method: CD-image
Machine: SunBlade 150
Processor: UltraSparc IIe
Memory: 2 Gb
Root Device: IDE
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [E]
Configure network HW: [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I tried to Install Debian Installer Beta4 on Sparc:
...
RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
Freeing initrd memory: 1766k freed
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
attempt to access beyond end of device
01:00: rw=0, want=4975, limit=4096
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to boot prom
The problem seems to be similar to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200404/msg00565.html
I tried to boot in a different way:
boot: linux root=/dev/hdc mount=devfs,dall rw
--> the same error
Regards,
Stephan
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247088-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2004 22:54:39 +0000
>From joshk@rackable.com Fri Jul 16 15:54:38 2004
Return-path: <joshk@rackable.com>
Received: from 64-60-248-69.cust.telepacific.net (mx.rackable.com) [64.60.248.69]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BlbbC-0005jn-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:54:38 -0700
Received: from vindicate.triplehelix.org ([10.201.1.112]) by mx.rackable.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:53:26 -0700
Received: from joshk by vindicate.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Blbba-0001VK-TS; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:55:02 -0700
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:55:02 -0700
From: Joshua Kwan <jkwan@rackable.com>
To: 247088-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: verified fixed
Message-ID: <20040716225502.GA5774@mx.rackable.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Joshua Kwan <joshk@rackable.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2004 22:53:26.0091 (UTC) FILETIME=[B42E59B0:01C46B87]
Delivered-To: 247088-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, I've verified for sure that this particular bug (Blars, you were
wrong: this is NOT the 'could not find initrd' bug, this is the
'ramdisk_size is too small' bug) is fixed since many moons ago. So I'm
closing it.
Thanks for reporting!
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=kF02
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--
Reply to: