Bug#242021: marked as done (back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies))
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400
with message-id <20040714171642.GA11446@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2004 11:36:36 +0000
>From debian@layer-acht.de Sun Apr 04 04:36:36 2004
Return-path: <debian@layer-acht.de>
Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.webmailer.de) [81.169.145.165]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BA5vY-0003p7-00; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 04:36:36 -0700
Received: from matrix.mein.net (c144152.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.144.152])
by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i34BaYCN000519
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:36:34 +0200 (MEST)
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:36:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200404031348.09234.debian@layer-acht.de> <20040403145534.GB11395@lambda> <200404041124.25867.debian@layer-acht.de>
In-Reply-To: <200404041124.25867.debian@layer-acht.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200404041336.20337.debian@layer-acht.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
Package: debian-installer
Hi,
> I just tried the floppies from
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/curre
>nt/powerpc-small/floppy/ which were built (or copied there) on 03-Apr-2004
> 09:01.
Now I've also tried
http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004.04.04/powerpc-small/flop
and get the same results as with 2004-03-04:
> Still no luck with the bootfloppy. Same as yesterday (but I only tried
> three floppy discs six times...) : The mac-tux gets black, the floppy
> ejected, the system freezes. So I took Jeremie boot-floppy again...
Only took three floppies this time ;-) One medium was faulty the other two
diffed ok. Anyway...
> The new root.img of yours now works again, fine.
>
> But after loading the net-drivers floppy the installations get thrown into
> d-i main menu, prompting me to select my keyboard. Which I have already
> done, but if I select to choose my keyboard, nothing happens. So I continue
> with detecting network hardware, but with an english keyboard layout now.
>
> Detecting network hardware, then network settings works fine and the
> installation continues. Since the base-install takes about an hour I don't
> now (yet) how it will continue...
>
>
> So, should 241847 be closed now and another one opened for getting thrown
> back to the main menu ?
>
> (Installation on Powermac 4400/200 with 48mb ram)
So this is the new bug report.
The 2004-04-04 installation is still ongoing, with 2004-04-03 I still had the
bug #241228 ("You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
2.4.25-powerpc-small. This will not work unless you have configured your boot
loader to use initrd...) which I thought was fixed with
base-installer_0.066_powerpc.changes ? I'll add info to bug#241228 if
2004-04-04 also shows this bug.
> regards,
> Holger
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242021-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:16:41 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Jul 14 10:16:41 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BknN3-0001uN-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:16:41 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61A01900A
for <242021-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:17:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F1C3E6E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 242021-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20040714171642.GA11446@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 242021-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm closing this bug, because it's not clear to me that it still exists.
If it does, please file a new report.
--=20
see shy jo
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA9Wp6d8HHehbQuO8RAu0yAKCrIJZnbaw2L7qo0rPC+JNQ3gOZngCcCujL
QTmMqfJFNVM6kIcyoFkJ4I8=
=fpdc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--
Reply to: