[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#238423: marked as done ([i386] [20040315] [busincesscard] success)



Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:40:41 -0400
with message-id <20040712214041.GA30331@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 23:42:28 +0000
>From bap@snot.cs.unm.edu Tue Mar 16 15:42:28 2004
Return-path: <bap@snot.cs.unm.edu>
Received: from snot.cs.unm.edu [64.106.46.98] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B3OCa-0006LJ-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:42:28 -0800
Received: from bap by snot.cs.unm.edu with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B3OCJ-0001Re-0Q
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:42:11 -0700
From: Barak Pearlmutter <barak@cs.may.ie>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: lilo + grub
Reply-to: barak@cs.may.ie
Message-Id: <E1B3OCJ-0001Re-0Q@snot.cs.unm.edu>
Sender: Barak Pearlmutter <bap@snot.cs.unm.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:42:11 -0700
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Just did a pretty-much stock i386 IDE installation using
sarge-i386-businesscard.iso, dated 15-Mar-2004 the version just before
beta-3.

Everything went fine except, after installation and rebooting and
letting it install minimal packages (no tasks selected) it installed
lilo even though grub was already installed.  This doesn't seem like a
very good default.
--
Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak@cs.may.ie>
 Hamilton Institute, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
 http://www-bcl.cs.may.ie/~barak/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 238423-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2004 16:16:39 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Jul 13 09:16:39 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BkPxO-0007Fc-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:16:39 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-107.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.107])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93426186A7
	for <238423-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:17:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A94F56EE9E; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:40:41 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 238423-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20040712214041.GA30331@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 238423-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The lilo install problem is fixed.

--=20
see shy jo

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA8wVZd8HHehbQuO8RAtwTAJ94spLyUb49RTioP+L5ppRajGbEYACfUniV
gWXaXkuOmfNhKDUb99uT7J8=
=BegT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--



Reply to: