[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#231836: marked as done (regression with plip)



Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:56:36 +0200
with message-id <1089194195.24831.389.camel@localhost>
and subject line Bug#231836: Does plip work now?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 06:43:50 +0000
>From sylvain.ferriol@imag.fr Sun Feb 08 22:43:50 2004
Return-path: <sylvain.ferriol@imag.fr>
Received: from fep04.swip.net (fep04-svc.swip.net) [130.244.199.132] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Aq594-0006Kp-00; Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:43:50 -0800
Received: from imag.fr ([80.170.166.159]) by fep04-svc.swip.net with ESMTP
          id <20040209064338.PWXG20010.fep04-svc.swip.net@imag.fr>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:43:38 +0100
Message-ID: <40272C30.6030908@imag.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:44:00 +0100
From: sylvain ferriol <sylvain.ferriol@imag.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: regression with plip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 20040209
Method:floppies boot,root,net-drivers

hello

after selecting, language and keyboard, the net modules list does not contain 'plip'.
i have to select 'non of the above' and reselect 'Load drivers from floppy' , i have a new screen 'Installer components to load' that i didn't in the first loop.

- i chose plip-modules, parport-modules
- i select plip in net module
===> endless loop

sylvain



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231836-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 09:56:46 +0000
>From jdthood@aglu.demon.nl Wed Jul 07 02:56:46 2004
Return-path: <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bi9AU-0007Jc-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 02:56:46 -0700
Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([82.161.38.140]:64097 helo=localhost)
	by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bi9AS-000MQu-Q7
	for 231836-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:56:44 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C9410D617
	for <231836-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed,  7 Jul 2004 11:56:36 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#231836: Does plip work now?
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
To: 231836-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <40EBC90A.1090606@imag.fr>
References: <1089190997.24831.385.camel@localhost>
	 <40EBC90A.1090606@imag.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1089194195.24831.389.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:56:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 231836-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 11:57, sferriol wrote:
> yes you can close it


OK
--
Thomas



Reply to: