[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#257663: marked as done (partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install)



Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:43:10 -0700
with message-id <[🔎] 1089142990.28889.161.camel@bittersweet.localnet>
and subject line Bug#257663: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 05:39:31 +0000
>From hegbloom@pdx.edu Sun Jul 04 22:39:31 2004
Return-path: <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
Received: from galar.oit.pdx.edu [131.252.122.15] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BhMCR-0007rb-00; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:39:31 -0700
Received: from host-242-184.resnet.pdx.edu (host-242-184.resnet.pdx.edu [131.252.242.184])
	by galar.oit.pdx.edu (8.12.11+/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i655cSMe011332
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install
From: Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:40:14 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1089006014.28889.66.camel@bittersweet.localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.9.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

package: partman-lvm
severity: normal

There should be a check that / is not a logical volume since the
mkinitrd does not support that.  Grub probably doesn't either, right?

It would be useful to have recipes for LVM installs.

-- 
Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 257663-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2004 19:42:21 +0000
>From hegbloom@pdx.edu Tue Jul 06 12:42:21 2004
Return-path: <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
Received: from gilling.oit.pdx.edu [131.252.122.17] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bhvpd-0001FU-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:42:21 -0700
Received: from host-242-184.resnet.pdx.edu (host-242-184.resnet.pdx.edu [131.252.242.184])
	by gilling.oit.pdx.edu (8.12.11+/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i66JgJn5019543;
	Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Bug#257663: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install
From: Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
To: 257663@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 257663-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040705203009.GB20787@riva.ucam.org>
References: <[🔎] 1089006014.28889.66.camel@bittersweet.localnet>
	 <[🔎] 40E922D2.6090201@univ.kiev.ua>
	 <[🔎] 1089047962.28889.86.camel@bittersweet.localnet>
	 <[🔎] 20040705203009.GB20787@riva.ucam.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:43:10 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1089142990.28889.161.camel@bittersweet.localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.9.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 257663-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 21:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> This was fixed in base-installer 0.085, which postdated tc1.

As long as it's really fixed, this ticket can be closed.  Cc the -done
address.

-- 
Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>



Reply to: