[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242827: marked as done (eepro needs io= parameter to load)



Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:47:04 -0400
with message-id <E1BekIa-0001df-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#242827: fixed in ddetect 0.102
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 01:47:55 +0000
>From psi@psi-aus.com Thu Apr 08 18:47:55 2004
Return-path: <psi@psi-aus.com>
Received: from wbm1.pair.net [209.68.3.41] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BBl7b-0001kY-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:47:55 -0700
Received: (qmail 45632 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Apr 2004 01:47:54 -0000
Received: from 203.59.117.11 ([203.59.117.11])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user psi@psi-aus.com)
        by webmail1.pair.com with HTTP;
        Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <61007.203.59.117.11.1081475274.squirrel@webmail1.pair.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: installation report
From: psi@psi-aus.com
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Confirm-Reading-To: psi@psi-aus.com
Disposition-Notification-To: psi@psi-aus.com
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Return-Receipt-To: psi@psi-aus.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: d-i beta 3
uname -a: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i586 unknown
Date: 9 Mar 2004
Method: Boot Floppies

Machine: DEC Venturis FX2 (P166)
Processor: Pentium 166
Memory: 64MB
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci: lspci not available during initial install

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

This bug report is similar to one I sent in a month or so ago...the
machine I am installing to is using an Intel Eepro10 (82595) network card.
 This is an ISA PnP device but PnP never works with linux so PnP has been
manually set to 'off' in the cards eeprom.

d-i cannot auto detect this card it seems (which is reasonable), so you
are presented with a huge list of odd names which are meant to represent
available network card modules...

...by the way, I've been using linux long enough to know most of these
modules, but surely we can make it a little easier on the newbie by
plonking descriptions of cards which commonly use a module to the right of
the module name?  Who would guess for instance that 'b44' is for a
broadcom NIC?

Anyway, I know I have to use the eepro module for this NIC, but when I
select it from the list the module fails to load, a bit more hardware
detection ensues then I'm presented with the list again.  Of course the
problem is that the module wants some parameters, in this case it wants
"io=0xYYY", this can be done with an 'insmod' from TTY2, but newbies won't
know this.

I filed a bug against module 'ne' for the same problem and it appears to
have been fixed, can we do the same for eepro if the module load fails?  I
imagine almost all ISA based NIC's (even some PnP types) will fail in this
way so this bug report should possibly ripple out to all ISA NIC based
modules that will be present on the d-i media.

Best regards,
Craig


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242827-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 00:53:05 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun Jun 27 17:53:05 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BekOO-0002QG-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:53:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BekIa-0001df-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:47:04 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: 242827-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#242827: fixed in ddetect 0.102
Message-Id: <E1BekIa-0001df-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:47:04 -0400
Delivered-To: 242827-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: ddetect
Source-Version: 0.102

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ddetect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

archdetect_0.102_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.102_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.102.dsc
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.102.dsc
ddetect_0.102.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.102.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.102_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.102_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.102_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.102_all.udeb
hw-detect_0.102_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect_0.102_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 242827@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org> (supplier of updated ddetect package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:36:05 -0700
Source: ddetect
Binary: hw-detect-full archdetect hw-detect ethdetect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.102
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Description: 
 archdetect - Hardware architect detector (udeb)
 ethdetect  - Detect network hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect  - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect-full - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (full version) (udeb)
Closes: 239890 242827 255247
Changes: 
 ddetect (0.102) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Joshua Kwan
     - Holy batman, Discover groks SBUS now! Disable the sunhme registration
       hack in hw-detect.sh.
     - And with that, add sbus to the list of busses probed by discover's
       invocation.
     - Fix Joey's template typo that caused modules to stop loading.
     - Correct some trivial Makefile style things.
   * Joey Hess
     - Add a "no ethernet card" option in ethdetect if autodetection finds
       nothing, to break out of the loop. Closes: #255247
     - If a module fails to load and there were no parameters, prompt for
       parameters at critical priority using a special template, and try the
       load again. Closes: #242827
     - Remove special case for ne, it should be handled by the above.
     - Prompt about whether to prompt for module parameters, to avoid 20
       useless questions on low priority installs (any better ideas?)
       Closes: #239890
   * Thiemo Seufer
     - Expand list of SGI ip32 CPUs.
   * Updated translations:
     - Bosnian (bs.po) by Safir Å eÄ?eroviÄ?
     - fa (fa.po) by Arash Bijanzadeh
     - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
     - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André Luís Lopes
     - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
Files: 
 310866e1e3ec864f8bf4bba376e0c840 1501 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.102.dsc
 d2f476c5fb2d39b3b623a158cd736c76 95666 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.102.tar.gz
 0b7b8059d76fda042a3b9b2b215bce45 43152 debian-installer standard hw-detect_0.102_all.udeb
 1906b62788d532a538832b211a5939fb 16842 debian-installer optional ethdetect_0.102_all.udeb
 50cd7cb97c9bcd3323ae51a1f3f11419 2612 debian-installer standard hw-detect-full_0.102_all.udeb
 05f8f46fa810f4a8d3def7f79ce02be5 2372 debian-installer standard archdetect_0.102_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=Ovx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: