Bug#225622: marked as done (pcmcia RequestIRQ problem (was Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain))
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:58:57 -0400
with message-id <20040627175857.GA11075@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:32:01 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Dec 30 22:32:00 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AbWqd-0003Mo-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:16:39 -0600
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-176.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.176])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DDB0817DFB; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 03:14:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1F7F56E0EB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:20:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:20:33 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@debian.org>,
Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
Subject: pcmcia RequestIRQ problem (was Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain)
Message-ID: <20031231032033.GA32415@kitenet.net>
Mail-Followup-To: submit@bugs.debian.org,
debian-boot@lists.debian.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@debian.org>,
Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
References: <20031230210023.GA9998@kitenet.net> <20031231012017.GA25596@samfundet.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031231012017.GA25596@samfundet.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-installer
Tags: d-i
I wrote:
> klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use
> Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found
> anything that has helped.
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> FWIW I've seen this too. I never solved it, but AFAIK somebody I knew fix=
ed
> it by enabling both ISA support (!) _and_ ISA PnP (!!) in the kernel conf=
ig.
> (I was told this was because PCMCIA (as opposed to CardBus) actually is an
> ISA-style bus.) I don't know what Debian's kernels do...
Well we obviously need a bug report for this. Mainly what I found on google=
=20
for this error message were suggestions to make sure that ISA support was in
the kernel, which it is for the d-i boot kernel:
CONFIG_ISA=3Dy
CONFIG_EISA=3Dy
CONFIG_ISAPNP=3Dm
In private mail, Jan L=C3=BCbbe reported he also had the problem with 2.6.0=
-test9,
and that he solved it by "building with isa-pnp not as a module". I've tried
loading isa-pnp on my notebook before starting pcmcia, but it doesn't do
anything.
I did find a way to make it work for me. If I comment out either or both of
these lines in /etc/pcmcia/config.opts, my orinoco card works:
exclude irq 4
exclude irq 7
It seems it can only use irq 4 or 7, no others work for some reason.
/proc/interrupts shows only these irqs in use: 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 15. The card=
bus
controller is on 3. Why can't it use irqs 3, 5, 6, or 10-13, or share an IR=
Q? I
don't know.
Perhaps for d-i we should remove the exclude irq lines entirely from the
config.opts. I really don't know.
--=20
see shy jo
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/8kCAd8HHehbQuO8RAgHmAKCIAVQPMZEsVqy3ko+v0sCf3H6+rgCgxCGp
Fp+4FtAIZ3dcBdC/Z2NtmK4=
=45iE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225622-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2004 18:03:40 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Jun 27 11:03:40 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bee0C-0003Yk-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:03:40 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4682B187B6
for <225622-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:59:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D9FB06EDFE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:58:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:58:57 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 225622-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20040627175857.GA11075@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 225622-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The pcmcia resource range question should handle this.
--=20
see shy jo
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA3wrhd8HHehbQuO8RAtV6AJ9PlJQspHkowMJ1La/N0ZlVNy232QCgo99y
DA1T0J1A3LQOtpPMzySTlUI=
=0VRO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--
Reply to: