[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255408: marked as done (first boot of new hppa install failed)



Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:32:42 -0400
with message-id <20040624173242.GA9113@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 18:20:34 +0000
>From kyle@mcmartin.ca Sun Jun 20 11:20:34 2004
Return-path: <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Received: from cpe0030ab0b413b-cm023469906297.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (mcmartin.ca) [24.157.3.237] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bc6vi-00087w-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:20:34 -0700
Received: by mcmartin.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6903AED0E; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:20:32 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: first boot of new hppa install failed
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040620182032.GD17987@mcmartin.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-06-16 daily build
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/2004-06-16/
Date: Sun Jun 20 14:15:52 EDT 2004
Method: Network boot.
	Booted from local tftp server.

Machine: HP PA-RISC B180L+
Processor: 180MHz PA7300LC
Memory: 420M (don't remember exactly)
Root Device: SCSI (sda)
Root Size/partition table: not relevant
Output of lspci:
not relevant

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Install went fine. Upon rebooting into new system however, the machine fails to give me a getty.

Starting periodic command scheduler: cron.                                      
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
/bin/sh: line 1: /dev/tts/0: No such file or directory                          
INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes

The console is on SERIAL_1, with no keyboard, mouse, or monitor hooked up. The
kernel properly spat out to the serial port.

This renders the system unusable.

I apologize if this has been fixed, but there are no netboot images more
recent than this, and I wanted to test to see if the kernel-image detection
was working properly (it is).

Thanks!
-- 
Kyle McMartin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255408-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2004 17:35:22 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Thu Jun 24 10:35:22 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BdY8A-0003HW-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:35:22 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-249.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.249])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF4A17F2B
	for <255408-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:33:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7F09B6E92E; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:32:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:32:42 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 255408-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20040624173242.GA9113@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 255408-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Closing based on #255545.

--=20
see shy jo

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA2xA5d8HHehbQuO8RArUQAJ0QuY0vk8R1PV06yMPQiYH3bbyNwQCgw7gE
oxMa8mWQy0vrQ5aoyNy0Ocw=
=9Ggu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--



Reply to: