Christian Perrier wrote: > B) broken sparc64 module loading (fix: busybox-cvs 20040415-3) > NEEDS also netcfg to be pushed. Is it release quality? > > Lot of discussion around this point : is netcfg release quality or > not? > Indirectly, sparc64 module loading depends on this, so deeply testing > netcfg for *regression* with regards to tc1 is needed. tc1 netcfg was > considered satisfactory though not perfect. I don't feel that the new netcfg is ready. It needs to settle down first, which is beginning to happen, but still not really. And it needs a lot of testing. There are alternatives to letting the busybox fix be blocked by netcfg; see my post to #255012. > Japanese with 2.6.6 needs close tests because of broken 2.6.6. During > the meeting, Korean also confirmed as broken in these circumstances. > > -->Kenshi Muto follows 2.6+JP in sid_d-i > > Pushing the unstable 2.6.6 kernel into testing is probably needed. Do you mean pushing kernel-image-2.6.6-2-386 to testing? I suspect that would also need base-installer changes because of the "-2" in the flavour. > E) broken ataraid and ida support (fix: libdebian-installer 0.26.really.0.22) > > We need finding people with SATA things and have them test sid_d-i I've asked James to put the fixed libd-i into testing from t-p-u. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature