[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#230437: marked as done (FWD: Install Report - Failed network install)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:01:48 -0400
with message-id <20040612000148.GA10340@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2004 23:36:11 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jan 30 15:36:11 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AmiBH-0000KF-00; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:36:11 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-50.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922AA18059
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:36:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AFA3E6ECB2; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:43:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:43:50 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FWD: Install Report - Failed network install
Message-ID: <20040130234350.GC3742@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sHrvAb52M6C8blB9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE,
	MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: installation-reports
=20
 The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and,
 according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the
 BTS so it will not be lost.

----- Forwarded message from Erik Dykema <ed2019@columbia.edu> -----

=46rom: Erik Dykema <ed2019@columbia.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:06:59 -0500
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Install Report - Failed network install

Hi-
	This is my first install report, apoligies for errors, welcome=20
	correction.

thanks,
Erik Dykema

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Jan 08 Daily, from=20
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/

uname -a: Linux 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30.39 i686 unknown
Date: Jan 8, 2004, 11:00am
Method: Network install via pxelinux: pxelinux.cfg/default:

LABEL sarge
KERNEL vmlinuz
APPEND load initrd=3Dnetboot-initrd.gz devfs=3Dmount ramdisk_size=3D8192=20
root=3D/dev/ram0 console=3Dtty0

Machine: Hp DL360 G3
Processor: 1 Intel Xeon
Memory: 1024 mb
Root Device: Smart Array 5i/532
Root Size/partition table:
disk1 ext2  34 gigs
disk5 linux swap 1 gig
Output of lspci:
lspci not found

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [E]
Mount partitions:       [E]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it

Note - This machine has two physical hard drives configured into a raid=20
0+1 array (in hardware), which the installer sees as one drive of half=20
the size (as it should).  Not sure if this has anything to do with=20
partitioning problems or not.

Comments/Problems:

1.  The installer first went to cfdisk.  I created the partitions (1=20
ext3 (bootable), 1 swap), wrote the table, and selected finish.  Then it=20
went to the next screen where I am supposed to configure/mount the=20
partitions, and instead of the list of my partitions (should have been=20
2), the list has 6 or 8 entries, most consisting of just one letter,=20
like this:
N
N
O
O
P
P
Q
Q
913 MiB

Anytime I select one of these list entries and hit <enter>  it boots me=20
out to the menu screen.  At the menu screen, I am able to select=20
auto-partition, which works fine and creates almost the same setup that=20
I would have created anyway, so this is not a fatal problem.

2.  On attempting to install the base system, it says that it is=20
retrieving package files, then finding package sizes, then retrieving=20
packages, validating, extracting packages.  Then the screen goes blue=20
for a bit with no menu, and comes back red saying: debootstrap exited=20
with an error, return value 1, check the log.  I hit <continue> and the=20
next screen says base system failed to install into /target/, check the=20
two debootstrap logs.  I check the two logs: debootstrap.err.log is 0=20
bytes, and debootstrap.log has one line:
ln: mawk : no such file or directory
Hitting continue kicks me back out to the menu.  I can attempt to=20
install the kernel but it just tries to do the base system again and fails.

When i look in /target/ there is some stuff in there, so it doesn't seem=20
like a disk / driver problem.

Erik


--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact=20
listmaster@lists.debian.org


----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
see shy jo

--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGuw2d8HHehbQuO8RAptoAJ9XDDxi4xGv12MxJTbvHHcygMNGkACfQ84u
z8jdQKZB//zd33GaeV7ZncE=
=gLso
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230437-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2004 00:09:26 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 17:09:26 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BYw5O-0000px-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:09:26 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-250.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.250])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03840187B5
	for <230437-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:09:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B60FE6EC37; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:01:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:01:48 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 230437-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040612000148.GA10340@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 230437-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours. Thanks for talking the time to file an installation report.

I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Some problems you reported are no longer present in current versions of t=
he
  installer.

If you can, please try installing again using a current version of the
debian installer. I recommend the tc1 release, which you can find on our
web page, <http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>. If you can, try
to reproduce the problems you reported using it, so we can verify that
they're all fixed. We look forward to your new installation report.

--=20
see shy jo

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAykfsd8HHehbQuO8RAkZZAKCeIrMytxueUqSC6uWVAuxV8wl2cwCfdQpU
ww1iQMAAqA9g5Dy+BgH5bcQ=
=OsXM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--



Reply to: