[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#229793: marked as done (Installation Report)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:55:22 -0400
with message-id <20040611235522.GA10013@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2004 16:39:11 +0000
>From amato@sci138.sci.unich.it Mon Jan 26 08:39:11 2004
Return-path: <amato@sci138.sci.unich.it>
Received: from sci138.sci.unich.it [192.167.92.38] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Al9lW-00008y-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:39:11 -0800
Received: from amato by sci138.sci.unich.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Al9lR-0006d2-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:39:05 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation Report
Message-Id: <E1Al9lR-0006d2-00@sci138.sci.unich.it>
From: Gianluca Amato <amato@sci138.sci.unich.it>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:39:05 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Jan 21, 2004 Linux gauss 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux gauss 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Method: Booting from the CD image including the base install. Base system
	installed from the CD.
Machine: assembled in house
Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz
Memory: 256 Mb 
Root Device: IDE MAXTOR 6L040J2 (40 Gb)
Root Size/partition table:  
/dev/hda1 on / type ext3
/dev/hda2 on /tmp type ext3
/dev/hda3 on /var type ext3
/dev/main/mirror on /mirror type ext3 (using LVM)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

During the hardware detection phase I received an error from modprobe 
regarding the inability to load the module ide-disk. However, this did
not cause any further problems (at least it seems so).

The LVM module did not work very well. I had to create manually a physical
volume with pvcreate. Moreover, I tried without success to install with the
root partition in LVM. The first part of the installation worked ok, but
I was not able to boot on the newly installed system.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2004 00:09:30 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 17:09:30 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BYw5S-0000qU-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:09:30 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-250.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.250])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E942187B7
	for <229793-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:09:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 749256EC59; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:55:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:55:22 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 229793-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040611235522.GA10013@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 229793-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours. Thanks for talking the time to file an installation report.

I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Some problems you reported are no longer present in current versions of t=
he
  installer.
- Some problems you reported are known, and have existing bugs in the BTS.

If you can, please try installing again using a current version of the
debian installer. I recommend the tc1 release, which you can find on our
web page, <http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>. If you can, try
to reproduce the problems you reported using it, so we can verify that
they're all fixed. We look forward to your new installation report.

--=20
see shy jo

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAykZqd8HHehbQuO8RAn/bAKCUnN+TEQ/Q9SjP3XWwT1uLy1E9SQCg5AUA
DqTSkiZEiF4n1WRGOkh1fLg=
=9p2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--



Reply to: