[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#250758: marked as done (Bits and pieces from an amd64 install)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:40:09 -0400
with message-id <20040611234009.GA9530@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2004 19:39:57 +0000
>From brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de Mon May 24 12:39:57 2004
Return-path: <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BSLIi-0002dX-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 12:39:57 -0700
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F50C174; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:39:25 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 21352-02; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:39:23 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
	by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 22462173; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:39:23 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BSLHa-0008La-JP; Mon, 24 May 2004 19:38:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bits and pieces from an amd64 install
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 19:38:30 +0000
Message-Id: <E1BSLHa-0008La-JP@dual>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: install
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

here are some bits and pieces I stumbled across while installing on amd64:

1. Anna tries to read /cdrom/dists/stable/Release even though its an
   unstable cd (adding dummy links to cd).
2. Debotstrap has no script for unstable (renaming sid to sarge).
3. Partitioning scheme unknown for this architecture (amd64 should use
   i386 DOS partitioning scheme).
4. Partman hangs on exit.
5. Partman fails to see partitions or do anything usefull. Even formating
   and mounting a partition manually doesn't help skipping partman
   (removing partman from cd).
6. debootstrap wants to install gcc-3.2-base (giving up and fixing it).

MfG
	Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 23:40:56 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 16:40:56 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BYvdo-0005C4-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:40:56 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-250.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.250])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7118563
	for <250758-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:40:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 605FC6EC37; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:40:09 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 250758-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040611234009.GA9530@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 250758-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours. Thanks for talking the time to file an installation report.

I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Some problems you reported are no longer present in current versions of t=
he
  installer.
- Your report mentions some strange problems that seem unlikely to be
  present in current versions of the installer.

--=20
see shy jo

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAykLZd8HHehbQuO8RAlkvAKCRj1otjlPIVGwqyIkX38fdaC48EwCglox4
fR0gBKP1SHuJDASfnJrBVi0=
=wxuv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--



Reply to: