Bug#227854: marked as done (Install report for Sparc netboot.)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:33:59 -0400
with message-id <20040611203359.GA7530@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 09:38:26 +0000
>From thomas@poindessous.com Thu Jan 15 03:38:26 2004
Return-path: <thomas@poindessous.com>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ah3xK-0008RB-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:38:26 -0600
Received: from thomas (bobillot-3-82-67-146-148.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.146.148])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779AEC348
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:38:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by thomas (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5C33F140EA; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:38:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:38:15 +0100
From: Thomas Poindessous <thomas@poindessous.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Install report for Sparc netboot.
Message-ID: <20040115093815.GA1877@poindessous.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="install-report.template"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sparc netboot build from cvs of 2004/01/14 and
with hacked udpkg, kdb-chooser.
uname -a:
Linux ultra5 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004/01/14 23h
Method:
netboot method with rarpd/tftpd.
dhcp network without proxy, but with a apt-proxy as mirror source.
Machine: Ultra 5
Processor: ultra-sparc II, 270
Memory: 192 Mo
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
(from memory)
/dev/hda1 ext2 other_linux
/dev/hda2 ext2 other_linux
/dev/hda3 ext2 other_linux
/dev/hda4 ext2 / 500 Mo
/dev/hda5 swap 70 Mo.
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Ultra IIi
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 11)
00:01.1 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 11)
01:01.0 Bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. EBUS (rev 01)
01:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal (rev 01)
01:02.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a)
01:03.0 IDE interface: CMD Technology Inc PCI0646 (rev 03)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
With patched udpkg and kbd-chooser, almost everything was alright.
Since everything was included in kernel, no module was installed.
partition hard-drives didn't work, I didn't check if fdisk was installed
since my hard-drive was partitioned.
something strange, the -smp kernel was installed.
and since there is no silo-installer, I need to use my current silo with
extra parameter root=/dev/hda4
But it was a very smooth install !
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227854-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 20:34:33 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 13:34:33 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BYsjR-0000wP-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:34:33 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-136.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.136])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F6017F8D
for <227854-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E4A776EC36; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:33:59 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 227854-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040611203359.GA7530@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 227854-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours. Thanks for talking the time to file an installation report.
I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Some problems you reported are no longer present in current versions of t=
he
installer.
If you can, please try installing again using a current version of the
debian installer. I recommend the tc1 release, which you can find on our
web page, <http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>. If you can, try
to reproduce the problems you reported using it, so we can verify that
they're all fixed. We look forward to your new installation report.
--=20
see shy jo
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAyhc3d8HHehbQuO8RAv1FAJwL+9R7uJX+ndYHFYArDENpiS6PsgCfSeMO
f/tvUCiEdXjnjq6MpXv8Gxs=
=S8Sl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Reply to: