[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#226040: marked as done (Install report: alpha businesscard 2004-01-02)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:20:19 -0400
with message-id <20040611202019.GA7009@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2004 22:43:02 +0000
>From vorlon@netexpress.net Sat Jan 03 16:43:01 2004
Return-path: <vorlon@netexpress.net>
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.76] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ActxK-0006JA-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 16:09:14 -0600
Received: by tennyson.netexpress.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 1522018E9FC; Sat,  3 Jan 2004 16:09:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:09:13 -0600
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Install report: alpha businesscard 2004-01-02
Message-ID: <20040103220913.GA20233@tennyson.netexpress.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-02 sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, from
  http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/alpha/
uname -a: n/a
Date: Sat Jan  3 15:46:40 CST 2004
Method: CD boot via SRM console
Machine: Microway AlphaPC 164SX
Processor: Alpha 21164 533 MHz
Memory: 384MB
Root Device: n/a
Output of lspci:
00:05.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
00:05.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
00:05.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
00:06.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21050 (rev 02)
00:07.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video Capture (rev 02)
00:07.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture (rev 02)
00:08.0 ISA bridge: Contaq Microsystems 82c693
00:08.1 IDE interface: Contaq Microsystems 82c693
00:08.2 IDE interface: Contaq Microsystems 82c693
00:08.3 USB Controller: Contaq Microsystems 82c693
00:09.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA 2164W [Millennium II]
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21040 [Tulip] (rev 23)
01:01.0 SCSI storage controller: QLogic Corp. ISP1020 Fast-wide SCSI (rev 01)
01:02.0 SCSI storage controller: QLogic Corp. ISP1020 Fast-wide SCSI (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [E]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives:     [E]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

>From the SRM bootloader, aboot tried to load the kernel with a root dev value of
/dev/rd/0.  The kernel doesn't recognize this as a valid device.  Manually booting
using root=/dev/ram0 instead succeeds, and gets me to the language chooser.

Language chooser: although the alpha images nominally include support for querying
the default language from the SRM environment, inspection of the d-i environment
shows that SRM env support is neither compiled into the kernel, nor available as a
module by the time /etc/rcS.d/S40srm-* runs.

Also, it appears that nothing inititalizes the file /var/log/syslog; instead of
seeing kernel output on vt 4, I see scrolling complaints from tail that it can't
open this file.

IDE/SCSI hardware detection appears to hang (or at least takes an insufferably
long time) while trying to load the qlogicisp module.  This is indeed the correct
driver for my SCSI card.  The pre-existing Debian install on this machine has the
module built into the kernel, and the kernel is 2.4.19 (vs. d-i's
2.4.22-1-generic).  There were known PCI issues with 2.4.20/21 on alpha, but I've
used 2.4.22 successfully elsewhere.  I'll try to get a stock kernel-image booting
on here, to see if I can reproduce the problem outside of d-i.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226040-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 20:20:56 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 13:20:56 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BYsWG-0000Rl-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:20:56 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-136.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.136])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39AB17F8D
	for <226040-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:20:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6C90E6EC36; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:20:19 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 226040-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040611202019.GA7009@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 226040-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours.

I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Some problems you reported are no longer present in current versions of t=
he
  installer.
- Some problems you reported are known, and have existing bugs in the BTS.
- Your report mentions some strange problems that seem unlikely to be
  present in current versions of the installer.

--=20
see shy jo

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAyhQDd8HHehbQuO8RAgoQAKCgy5DEYdkbChxqDCtQ4aXxl6p3YACfdZpx
fwZy2KhvC49910WScVCI/nU=
=uPku
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--



Reply to: