Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image
stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have updated the sid-amd64-cdrom.iso on alioth to the latest D-I
>> images, debs and udebs from alioth including a fixed sid console-data.
> That console-data fix, is that related to #253470
> where an undocumented debconf "feature" is used ?
>
> If yes, then please provide the changes ( a patch )
>
>
> Thanks
> Geert Stappers
The Bugreport in the BTS says
| This is console-data apparently using an undocumented debconf "feature"
| that never did anything and that was removed from the latest version.
| I've put it back, sigh.
Since it didn't do anything removing it should have the same
effect. So thats what I did.
MfG
Goswin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Nurd console-data-2002.12.04dbs/debian/changelog console-data-2002.12.04dbs.amd64/debian/changelog
--- console-data-2002.12.04dbs/debian/changelog 2004-06-08 20:34:35.000000000 +0000
+++ console-data-2002.12.04dbs.amd64/debian/changelog 2004-06-10 04:28:30.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+console-data (2002.12.04dbs-41.0.0.1.pure64) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove use of previous_module in console-data.config
+
+ -- Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:38:10 +0200
+
console-data (2002.12.04dbs-41) unstable; urgency=low
* Translations:
diff -Nurd console-data-2002.12.04dbs/debian/console-data.config console-data-2002.12.04dbs.amd64/debian/console-data.config
--- console-data-2002.12.04dbs/debian/console-data.config 2004-06-05 07:29:50.000000000 +0000
+++ console-data-2002.12.04dbs.amd64/debian/console-data.config 2004-06-10 04:28:55.000000000 +0000
@@ -1042,7 +1042,6 @@
@retval = go;
if ($retval[0] eq 30) {
set ('console-data/keymap/policy', "Don't touch keymap");
- previous_module;
exit 30;
}
@@ -1067,7 +1066,6 @@
if ($seen eq 'false') {
# Hitting "back" here has no meaning mostly, but try to behave as sanely as I
# can think of.
- previous_module;
exit 30;
} else {
next;
Reply to: