Re: SATA support.
At 7 Jun 04 05:03:38 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > I have seen a message to this list that framebuffer support in 2.6.6 is badly
> > broken. This is of course not acceptable for d-i as it depends on fb for many
> Yep. Pictures of Masanori Goto puzzled by this crash:
> (The 2nd picture...the 1st is Kenshi Muto installing Windows...:-)))
Yeah, give me a chance to advocate myself! I haven't a fun so for
installing Windows 2003 :-)
And in this picture, Masanori's looking is filesystem corruption
(Journaling area corruption, he says '2.6.6 seems something wrong
BTW, yes, kernel 2.6.6 has a serious problem around VGA16 framebuffer.
I reported as #251861.