Bug#221213: marked as done (partconf: Uninstallable due to broken depends)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:31:18 -0700
with message-id <20040607073118.GA12135@triplehelix.org>
and subject line Bug#221213: fixed already?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2003 09:45:30 +0000
>From brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de Mon Nov 17 03:45:29 2003
Return-path: <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALfwn-0001qJ-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 03:45:29 -0600
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 442E012C; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:28 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.12.26])
by localhost (mx5 [134.2.12.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 18410-04; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:24 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from dual (semeai [134.2.15.66])
by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AB302134; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:20 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ALfwb-0007oB-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: partconf: Uninstallable due to broken depends
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:16 +0100
Message-Id: <E1ALfwb-0007oB-00@dual>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: partconf
Version: 0.15 (not installed)
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Partconf Build-Depends on "libparted1.6-dev | libparted-dev" and its
binary packages "Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}". That results in
"Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdebconfclient0,
libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.16), libparted1.6-0 (>= 1.6.0)". That makes
them uninstallable.
The binary packages should depend on the respective udebs:
Package: libc-udeb
Provides: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-10
Package: libparted1.6-udeb
Provides: libparted
MfG
Goswin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.4.21-ac4 #1 SMP Sat Jul 5 17:53:13 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 221213-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2004 07:31:20 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Mon Jun 07 00:31:20 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.188]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXEbH-0003Hs-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:31:20 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.201.217 with login)
by smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2004 07:31:19 -0000
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9D8212DDD0; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:31:18 -0700
To: 221213-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#221213: fixed already?
Message-ID: <20040607073118.GA12135@triplehelix.org>
References: <20040607033450.GA23713@darjeeling.triplehelix.org> <87ekorltdj.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ekorltdj.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: joshk@triplehelix.org (Joshua Kwan)
Delivered-To: 221213-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Looks like it.
>=20
> MfG
> Goswin
OK.
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=vvix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
Reply to: