Bug#215161: marked as done (overflowing display with frame-buffer)
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:35:35 -0300
with message-id <20040530173535.GA21167@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 20:07:35 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Oct 10 15:07:27 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A83Xr-0005DG-00; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:07:27 -0500
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial232.pm3bloun2.bloun.naxs.com [216.98.69.232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D76717E57
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:07:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4FED6E10F; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:07:37 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: overflowing display with frame-buffer
Message-ID: <20031010200737.GA23676@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.30
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.46
Severity: normal
I booted my sister Anna's computer, a old VA linux tower machine (full HW d=
ata
on request), using the d-i bootfloppy and root floppy set, built by myself
today. This included the 2.4.22 kernel, and the framebuffer drivers. The
vga16fb driver was loaded and I got a nice display. So far so good. (I've
filed another bug about vt switching problems with this setup.)
I belive the screen res in this setup is 80x30. At least that's what
the dmesg says, I did not bother to count. I am using the cdebconf newt
frontend of course.
If cdebconf is asked to display the hw-detect/not_included message,
with MODULE SUBSTed to "eepro100" and CARDNAME to "Intel Corporation=20
82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]", then I get some minor display corruption.
The right border of the dialog box is broken and white "fill" from inside it
expands out to the right-hand side of the screen. I'd guess that cdebconf
is not calculating the width correctly. Note that all the words fit inside
the dialog box. I do not see this with other note dialogs though.
(This image has hw-detect 0.44 on it.)
--=20
see shy jo
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/hxGJd8HHehbQuO8RAkKnAKC+lSYxA1Te6G3dTrvdosvUgcYCZgCgtrzO
mv0PXc+HAQzegbR/BBaY/Ec=
=1wrE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215161-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2004 17:36:08 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun May 30 10:36:07 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUUEB-0002mJ-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 10:36:07 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [200.96.126.218])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448021853B
for <215161-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 30 May 2004 17:36:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9536E6E0C2; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:35:35 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 14:35:35 -0300
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 215161-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20040530173535.GA21167@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 215161-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I can't reproduce this anymore if I do I will file a new bug.
--=20
see shy jo
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAuhtnd8HHehbQuO8RAuy4AKCmHMgRD0mpRuOyMxguvITR1WdoygCg0vqq
JlezN9dB5j+mjHk/Xh5rjbU=
=Uhka
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
Reply to: