Bug#230449: marked as done (FWD: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority))
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 14:21:42 +0100
with message-id <20040525132142.GA2370@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line FWD: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2004 23:39:49 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jan 30 15:39:49 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmiEn-0000UL-00; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:39:49 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-50.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C7017E0D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:39:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4A2056ECB2; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:47:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:47:29 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FWD: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority)
Message-ID: <20040130234729.GN3742@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IoFIGPN1N3g1Ryqz"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
--IoFIGPN1N3g1Ryqz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: installation-reports
=20
The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and,
according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the
BTS so it will not be lost.
----- Forwarded message from Andrew Pollock <debian-lists-2004@andrew.net.a=
u> -----
=46rom: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists-2004@andrew.net.au>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:34:51 +1100
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority)
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2
uname -a: Linux brutus 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Tue Jan 6 21:29:44 EST 2004 i686 GNU=
/Linux
Date: Sat Jan 24 18:04:25 EST 2004
Method: business card CD, net install, DEBCONF_PRIORITY=3Dmedium, transpare=
ntly proxied
Machine: Noname clone
Processor: Pentium IV
Memory: 256M
Root Device: IDE, /dev/hda2
Root Size/partition table: =20
Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units =3D cylinders of 16065 * 512 =3D 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 7295 58597056 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2 7296 7356 489982+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda3 7357 7372 128520 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda4 7373 14593 58002682+ 8e Linux LVM
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 464M 55M 386M 13% /
/dev/base/home 2.0G 33M 1.9G 2% /home
/dev/base/tmp 2.0G 33M 1.9G 2% /tmp
/dev/base/usr 9.9G 151M 9.2G 2% /usr
/dev/base/var 9.9G 95M 9.3G 1% /var
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge =
(rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (r=
ev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev 12)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 12)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 12)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 12)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 12)
00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 12)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX =
400] (rev b2)
03:00.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1370 [AudioPCI] (rev 01)
03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev =
08)
03:02.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV23 IEEE-1394 Control=
ler
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I note that the lvm10 package is still not being installed into the fresh=
=20
installation even when LVM is used during the install, resulting in a system
that can't mount it's filesystems on first boot. I've filed a bug as it
doesn't appear that one has been yet.
--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.o=
rg
----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
see shy jo
--IoFIGPN1N3g1Ryqz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAGu0Rd8HHehbQuO8RApAqAJ4t7MYUaiTMDdmb2cBL0JFctu2EzACfelO0
d/iSyR9EZe8CpKeWB33n9M0=
=zVaV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IoFIGPN1N3g1Ryqz--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230449-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2004 16:08:19 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Wed May 26 09:08:19 2004
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BT0x1-0002Y6-00; Wed, 26 May 2004 09:08:19 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id A259564D3B; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 71BF310035; Tue, 25 May 2004 14:21:42 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:21:42 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: debian-lists-2004@andrew.net.au
Cc: 230449-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: FWD: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority)
Message-ID: <20040525132142.GA2370@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <20040130234729.GN3742@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040130234729.GN3742@kitenet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 230449-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> I note that the lvm10 package is still not being installed into the fresh
> installation even when LVM is used during the install, resulting in a system
> that can't mount it's filesystems on first boot. I've filed a bug as it
> doesn't appear that one has been yet.
lvmcfg now uses a more reliable way to detect whether lvm2 should be
installed.
BTW, can you get a new image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see how that
works for you?
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: