[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#249633: installation-reports i386 netinst expert26 problem with libata install



Some more information on this topic.

Today I used the cd I burned yesterday with i386 netinstall 110MB
image from 20040523 for some further testing on the hw I mention above.

I changed in the bios to enhanced mode for both SATA and PATA. The
boot with expert26 proceeded normally and I could perform the
installation to some point. But when probing some hardware the system
frooze. This behaviour is known to the kernel people, in particular J
Garzik, but it was interesting to see the actual state of the kernel
used on the d-i.

After turning enhanced mode off for PATA and keeping it on for SATA, I
continued with booting with expert26 and performing the install onto
the SATA disk identified after manually modprobing the ata_piix
module, which proceeded nicely until first reboot. Strangely enogh the
existing partition types were not recognized the d-i made new
filesystems wihtout a fuss. The 2.6.5-1-i386 kernel then panicked at
first reboot because it couldn't find the disk (I think). I guess the
module ata_piix didn't load correctly, as it didn't during the
cd-boot. And thus the install couldn't complete.

fter powering down and installing a new PATA disk and keeping the
SATA I did a standard install to /dev/hda1 with /dev/hda2 as
swap. Interestingly enough the installed kernel recognizes the SATA
disk by loading ata_piix at boot time. This was 2.6.5-1-i386. Same
thing with 2.6.5-1-686-smp, which I tested after installing it. So why
does these kernels not load the correct modules from the d-i cd?

Even grub on /dev/hda recognized the kernel on the not finished
installation at /dev/sda1 that remained after my unsuccesful
installation try. Grub was however unable to boot it and I came back
into grub.

I also tested the d-i 2.4 kernel, a 2.4.26 which doesn't have the
ata_piix module.



Some more installation details, in particular on net configuration.

Booting with expert26 for a 2.6 kernel:

During net configuration, the default question is dhcp
configuration. By selecting <go back> one finds the question on dhcp
or static, with dhcp as default.

Booting with expert for a 2.4 kernel:

During net configuration, one immediately is given the choice of dhcp
or static. Ok so far. But selecting static and entering a valid
ip-address the installer chokes and argues that the numbers are not
valid, and each group has to be 0-255. After this one is returned to
the same menu with the same values as one entered before. And this
time they are accepted!

I suggest that the behaviour for netconfiguration be independent of
whether one selects a 2.4 or 2.6 kernel. And preferably being able to
choose between dhcp or static as default, at least for expert mode. Of
course the dhcp choice could be preselected so that a normal
installation would only require one to press return.


And then there are some annoying questions on turning on pcmcia
support, which there is no hardware for.


Anders Lennartsson



Reply to: