[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#250021: marked as done (netcfg: Doesn't create resolv.conf if no domain name set by DHCP server)



Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2004 11:17:14 -0400
with message-id <E1BRuiw-0002Qf-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#250021: fixed in netcfg 0.65
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2004 12:42:43 +0000
>From martin@walnut.methody.org Thu May 20 05:42:43 2004
Return-path: <martin@walnut.methody.org>
Received: from public2-cosh5-6-cust60933.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (eames.methody.org) [80.4.152.5] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BQmsk-0006cq-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 05:42:43 -0700
Received: from henry.methody.org (henry.methody.org [::ffff:10.10.10.13])
  by eames.methody.org with esmtp; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:42:39 +0100
Received: from l4545 by henry.methody.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BQmsE-0000DY-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:42:10 +0100
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 13:42:10 +0100
From: Martin Orr <martin@walnut.methody.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: netcfg: Doesn't create resolv.conf if no domain name set by DHCP server
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040520124205.GA820@dummy.henry.methody.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.59
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netcfg
Version: 0.64
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

make_resolv_conf in netcfg's dhclient-script is surrounded by
if [ -n "$new_domain_name" -a -n "$new_domain_name_servers" ]
so no resolv.conf is created unless the DHCP server specifies a domain name.
My ISP doesn't give a domain name, but I still need a resolv.conf to contain
the DNS servers.

The line to add a domain name to resolv.conf has its own
if [ -n "$new_domain_name" ]
so perhaps the first line of the function should be
if [ -n "$new_domain_name" -o -n "$new_domain_name_servers" ]

(dhcp-client's dhclient-script has no such check at all)

-- 
Martin Orr
Linux Administrator,
Methodist College Belfast

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 15:23:14 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun May 23 08:23:14 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BRuok-0006Fg-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 08:23:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BRuiw-0002Qf-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 11:17:14 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: 250021-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#250021: fixed in netcfg 0.65
Message-Id: <E1BRuiw-0002Qf-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:17:14 -0400
Delivered-To: 250021-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.65

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netcfg-dhcp_0.65_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.65_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.65_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.65_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.65.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.65.dsc
netcfg_0.65.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.65.tar.gz
netcfg_0.65_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.65_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 250021@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 03:04:02 -0700
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.65
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Description: 
 netcfg     - Configure the network (udeb)
 netcfg-dhcp - Configure the network via DHCP (udeb)
 netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 241490 250021 250074
Changes: 
 netcfg (0.65) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Joshua Kwan
     - Fix machine state in static configuration to call QUIT.
       (Closes: #250074)
     - Rewrite resolv.conf in static configuration once we acquire a
       domain name.
     - DHCP server is not required to supply a domain name. (Closes: #250021)
     - Switch to using mii-diag-udeb instead of mii-lite.c, which doesn't
       seem to work across the board. (also addresses #250074)
     - In static configuration, if the IP address specified turns out to be
       the same as what we suggest for the gateway, nuke the last part of
       the dotted quad because gateway == IP makes no sense. (Closes: #241490)
     - Turn off backup for error messages in static configuration.
     - Bake all of the getif* functions into one big char**-returning jelly
       roll, get_all_ifs().
   * Bastian Blank
     - Make it buildable again on s390.
   * Updated translations:
     - Bulgarian (bg.po) by Ognyan Kulev
     - Catalan (ca.po) by Jordi Mallach
     - German (de.po) by Alwin Meschede
     - Spanish (es.po) by Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña
     - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
     - Finnish (fi.po) by Tapio Lehtonen
     - Gallegan (gl.po) by Héctor Fernández López
     - Norwegian (nb.po) by Knut Yrvin
     - Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
     - Norwegian (nn.po) by HÃ¥vard Korsvoll
     - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
     - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor
     - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann
     - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu
Files: 
 156cf6f3c9dee8b3c7b1e634d57107f0 1526 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.65.dsc
 59b3aa1fc37fa98385912cadd520e937 163486 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.65.tar.gz
 d8c6c07dbc267f902350166912c94e8a 130762 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.65_i386.udeb
 19e08928ad5c6de9d89265065d74408e 99790 debian-installer optional netcfg-dhcp_0.65_i386.udeb
 ddeed6eef252fca7e37dec75707d526a 108020 debian-installer optional netcfg-static_0.65_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=VQ07
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: