Bug#237399: marked as done (SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable on mistyped gateway)
Your message dated Sat, 22 May 2004 13:18:28 -0700
with message-id <20040522201828.GA5703@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line fixed long ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 01:36:04 +0000
>From gwolf@gwolf.cx Tue Mar 09 17:36:04 2004
Return-path: <gwolf@gwolf.cx>
Received: from upn1-25.ajusco.upn.mx (shmate.cabraslocas.upn.mx) [200.23.113.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B0sdg-0005NM-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:36:04 -0800
Received: by shmate.cabraslocas.upn.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 81332233BD; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:30:34 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.50
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:30:34 -0600
Message-Id: <20040310013034.81332233BD@shmate.cabraslocas.upn.mx>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040309
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-09,
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey//d-i/sparc/daily/cdrom-mini.iso
uname -a: Linux refri 2.4.24-refri #1 SMP Fri Jan 16 14:06:22 CST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-03-09
Method:
Booted from the CDROM mini ISO. The machine is connected directly to
the network, no proxies intervening
Machine: Sparc Ultra Enterprise 450
Processor: 4xUltraSparc-II 480MHz
Memory: 4 GB
Root Device: SCSI, installed on fourth drive (/dev/sdd)
Root Size/partition table:
Partitioning was carried out using the automatic option in d-i (see
the comments further down)
Disk /dev/sdd (Sun disk label): 27 heads, 107 sectors, 24620 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2889 * 512 bytes
Device Flag Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 0 2875 4152937+ 1 Boot
/dev/sdd2 2875 13371 15161472 82 Linux swap
/dev/sdd3 0 24620 35563590 5 Whole disk
/dev/sdd4 13371 24620 16249180+ 83 Linux native
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdd1 3.9G 280M 3.5G 8% /
/dev/sdd4 16G 33M 15G 1% /home
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
01:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
02:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
03:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
04:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
04:01.0 Bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. EBUS (rev 01)
04:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal (rev 01)
04:02.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875 (rev 03)
04:03.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875 (rev 03)
04:04.0 Display controller: Texas Instruments TVP4020 [Permedia 2] (rev 11)
05:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Psycho PCI Bus Module
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [E]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
There were a couple of minor quirks which did not affect the
installation process, but would scare away novice users - For example,
at bootup, at the first HW detection phase, I got an "Error while
running 'modprobe -v sr_mod'". This message, as well as "Error while
running 'modprobe -v ide-cd'", appeared again, also under the title
'hardware detection', after setting up the network.
Now, for the more important points:
- At first, I was trying to set up the network incorrectly. I was
assigned a x.x.x.20/28 IP address, and -mistakenly- was looking for
the router in x.x.x.31, which is unreachable and produces a
'SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable' message. I didn't note the exact
message, but d-i just told me ther was an error while configuring the
network. This should probably be informed in a more granular way,
maybe telling that 'there was a problem with the gateway you
specified'. Using the correct network configuration, of course, solved
the problem.
- Partitioning: The system has 4x36.4GB hard disks, I decided to install
only in the fourth disk. If I ask the installer to 'Create new
partition' and accept the default (36.4GB) value, I get immediately
two error messages saying "ERROR!!! Can't have the end before the
start!", and then "Unable to satisfy all constraints on the
partition". This does not happen if I ask the partition to be only
30GB - Might it have something to do with the Sun disklabel scheme?
- Partitioning: If I got the last message once, I will get it again and
again no matter what I choose in the partitioning module. In order to
partition my disk, I have to leave the module (with 'Go back') and get
back in. I chose automatic partitioning. If I ask the partitioner to
use the scheme with many partitions (/usr, /usr/local, /var, /var/mail,
etc.), and got an error telling me there was no space to create the
last (eigth) partition. The installer took sdd3 (which should be a
wholedisk partition) - Of course, I cancelled the partitioning and
proceeded with the simpler root-and-home scheme offered. This time, it
worked correctly.
In /var/log/partman, I got:
(...)
parted_server: OUT: 8 21607686144-22032207359 424521216 primary ext3 /dev/scsi/host 1/bus0/target3/lun0/part8
parted_server: OUT: -1 22032207360-36417116159 14384908800 primary free /dev/scsi/host 1/bus0/target3/lun0/part-1
The problem seems to be parted (or one of the d-i modules) not being
able to see beyond three bits worth of partitions :(
- Install base system: I chose unstable, and I think that was my main
mistake. After downloading all the needed packages and installing part
of them, I got a "Base system installation error - The debootstrap
program exited with an error (return value 127) Check
/var/log/messages or see virtual console 3 for the details". In VC3, I
had:
Errors were encountered while processing:
exim4-daemon-light
mailx
at
exim4
exim4-config
exim4-base
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep: not found
Looking at /var/log/mesages, I found several cases such as:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4-daemon-light:
exim4-daemon-light depends on libgnutls7 (>= 0.8.12-2); however:
Package libgnutls7 is not installed.
dpkg: error processing exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Once again, this might have been caused by my choice of 'unstable'. I
will try to do this installation again with 'testing' and report back
on this bug (although it might take some days).
- After failing on the base system install (although mostly everything
was in place), whenever I chose to install the boot loader, the
installer tried again to install the base system, and bombed in its
way out. No kernel was installed in the system.
I eventually gave up and booted the system using a kernel of my own
(that was on another of the machine's hard drives). I was not asked to
go through the second phase of the installation, although I ran it with
'base-config'. The machine is running perfectly now.
All in all, d-i performed _way_ better than what I expected in Sparc,
even with the few glitches (some of them attributable to me, I agree).
Congratulations!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-shmate
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237399-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 20:18:31 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Sat May 22 13:18:31 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.81]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRcwx-00009V-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 13:18:31 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.221.19 with login)
by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 May 2004 20:18:31 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7EB2DDB1
for <237399-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 May 2004 13:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BRcwu-0001UD-00
for <237399-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 May 2004 13:18:28 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:18:28 -0700
To: 237399-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed long ago
Message-ID: <20040522201828.GA5703@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 237399-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Gunnar,
This bug should now be fixed, it should warn you instead if a gateway is
unreachable and take you back.
Thanks,
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=7XV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
Reply to: