[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#249364: marked as done (kbd-chooser: missing amd64 support.)



Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 17:02:07 -0400
with message-id <E1BPpFP-00009T-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#249364: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2004 22:02:11 +0000
>From Q@ping.be Sun May 16 15:02:10 2004
Return-path: <Q@ping.be>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BPThy-0006K4-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 15:02:10 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 29A8A2B40C1
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:02:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238])
	by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2E2B40A1
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:02:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 023A6158AD5; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:02:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 00:02:08 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: kbd-chooser: missing amd64 support.
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040516220208.GC18617@ping.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: Q@ping.be
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.52
Tags: patch

Could you please add amd64 to the arch list in the control file?


Kurt

--- debian/control      (revision 15517)
+++ debian/control      (working copy)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16),  libdebian-installer4-dev,
po-debconf (>= 0.5.0), flex | flex-old , bison,
libdebconfclient0-dev (>= 0.49)

 Package: kbd-chooser
-Architecture: i386 ia64 hppa alpha sparc mips mipsel arm m68k powerpc
+Architecture: i386 ia64 hppa alpha sparc mips mipsel arm m68k powerpc amd64
 XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 12
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, console-keymaps, archdetect
 Description: Detect a keyboard and select layout


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 249364-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2004 21:09:16 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon May 17 14:09:16 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BPpMK-0002T1-00; Mon, 17 May 2004 14:09:16 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BPpFP-00009T-00; Mon, 17 May 2004 17:02:07 -0400
From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>
To: 249364-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#249364: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.54
Message-Id: <E1BPpFP-00009T-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:02:07 -0400
Delivered-To: 249364-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: kbd-chooser
Source-Version: 0.54

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kbd-chooser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kbd-chooser_0.54.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.54.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.54.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.54.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.54_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.54_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 249364@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org> (supplier of updated kbd-chooser package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 06:32:14 -0700
Source: kbd-chooser
Binary: kbd-chooser
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.54
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>
Description: 
 kbd-chooser - Detect a keyboard and select layout (udeb)
Closes: 249164 249364
Changes: 
 kbd-chooser (0.54) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Joshua Kwan
     - Add amd64 to Architecture list (Closes: #249364)
   * Alastair McKinstry
     - Fix default keyboard handling. Closes: #249164.
     - Don't include AT and USB keyboards on DECstations.
Files: 
 4e65d80795bb57897dae7231942e408c 750 debian-installer standard kbd-chooser_0.54.dsc
 99e32db8693801a688c30555f5307c35 134806 debian-installer standard kbd-chooser_0.54.tar.gz
 9b96b58d07f10fc4fe65c4873c072831 33110 debian-installer standard kbd-chooser_0.54_i386.udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAqSgDQTK/kCo4XFcRAjyPAJwPYJB+AG3Lk79xIpWMjfxjbfLVcgCdGQXG
os4pjihd1QfF1nq02gQY/rw=
=/yYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: