Bug#244038: marked as done (No wireless config)
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 08:36:15 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405170834070.27736-100000@cable.arricc.net>
and subject line Bug#244038: more info needed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 10:59:10 +0000
>From mark@arricc.net Fri Apr 16 03:59:10 2004
Return-path: <mark@arricc.net>
Received: from cable.arricc.net [212.18.240.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BER3u-0004RR-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:59:10 -0700
Received: from mark (helo=localhost)
by cable.arricc.net with local-esmtp (Exim 4.10 #1 (Arricc.Net))
id 1BER3s-0008JR-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:59:08 +0100
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:59:08 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark McRitchie <mark@arricc.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: No wireless config
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404161152550.15385-100000@cable.arricc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso Beta 3
uname -a: didn't get this far.
Date: 14/04/2004
Method: CD boot with attempted network install
Machine: Aged Thinkpad
Processor: ~p133
Memory: 42MB
Root Device: IDE
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [E]
Reboot: [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Cannot complete the install via the network the drivers for my wireless
pcmcia nic are present, but there is no facility to set the WEP keys and
ESSID.
Seemed to instal the base system as far as I could tell but failed on
reboot.
System previously had Woody installed.
~Mark.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244038-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2004 07:36:18 +0000
>From mark@arricc.net Mon May 17 00:36:18 2004
Return-path: <mark@arricc.net>
Received: from cable.arricc.net [212.18.240.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BPcfa-0003sO-00; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:36:18 -0700
Received: from mark (helo=localhost)
by cable.arricc.net with local-esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Arricc.Net))
id 1BPcfX-0001AS-ID; Mon, 17 May 2004 08:36:15 +0100
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 08:36:15 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark McRitchie <mark@arricc.net>
To: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>, <244038-quiet@bugs.debian.org>
cc: 244038-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#244038: more info needed..
In-Reply-To: <20040517045851.GI29680@triplehelix.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405170834070.27736-100000@cable.arricc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 244038-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Mark,
>
> What format did you enter your key in? I can't seem to find out why your
> wireless_key wasn't getting written.
I used "s:sekrt" style.
> Also, as usual, try a new installer image. I have just uploaded a new
> netcfg -- try sometime tomorrow evening. It might have gotten
> 'inadvertently' fixed ;)
Sorry, I forgot to update this.
It worked when I tried Beta 4 of the new installer.
Regards,
Mark.
Reply to: