On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:52:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net> [2004-05-12 09:46]: > > If I understand correctly, one simple way to get there would be to > > define XB-Subarchitecture appropriately in the partman control and > > undo the menuitem change. > > I'm not sure XB-Subarchitecture will work since you probably have to > list _all_ supported subarches, otherwise it will think they are not I was planning on that. > supported. I could be wrong, though. In the meantime, I just added > a debian/isinstallable script since I had the same problem on mips. > Feel free to add m68k, and test it - it seems to work for me. Using Cool, I'll try it out. > XB-Subarchitecture would definitely be nicer though if that works. What is the real difference? Does XB-Subarchitecture keep it from being downloaded while isinstallable keeps it from being installed in the menu? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature