Bug#227498: failed install with 20040111 sarge netinst ISO on Tosh SatPro 4300 Laptop
- To: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>, 227498@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#227498: failed install with 20040111 sarge netinst ISO on Tosh SatPro 4300 Laptop
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:37:21 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040506193721.GA25877@deprecation.cyrius.com>
- Reply-to: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>, 227498@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87brp9ngs2.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <20040113235343.GA21607@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20040114131056.GA5923@sprite.fr.eu.org>
- References: <87brp9ngs2.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <87brp9ngs2.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <20040113235343.GA21607@deprecation.cyrius.com> <87brp9ngs2.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <20040113235343.GA21607@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20040114131056.GA5923@sprite.fr.eu.org>
* James Troup <james@nocrew.org> [2004-01-12 18:49]:
> o ISOLINUX prompt hangs, then prints something like "Failed to get
> sector size, assuming 0800" after ~1.5 minute and boots.
Can you test with beta4 if you still see this?
> o Chose 3c59x for my network card and got the "Ethernet card not
> found" hate-message... waited 10 seconds or so and my PCMCIA card
> came to life as expected.
This has been fixed.
> o There was no dialog/progress bar while creating partitions which
> took quite some time.
There are progress bars now.
> o The system ejected the CDROM and gave me the "System Reboot" dialog;
> after I pressed "Continue", it dropped into the "Configure debconf"
> dialog, but I wasn't able to do anything with it as the system was
This shouldn't happen.
> * On reboot, the network didn't come up. I got the message below (by
> hand cut'n'paste):
> /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/pcmcia/i82365.o: /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/pcmcia/i82356.o: unresolved symnol isapnp_find_dev_R27cb2cad
This has been fixed.
> o I selected "qwerty", "British" in the console tools config stage,
> and saw "loading mac-usb-uk" flash past?
Is this still there?
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: