[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#234564: marked as done (minor problems)



Your message dated Wed, 05 May 2004 00:17:02 -0400
with message-id <E1BLDqA-0007e7-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#234564: fixed in ddetect 0.94
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2004 15:45:21 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Tue Feb 24 07:45:21 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AvekK-0004iW-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:45:21 -0800
Received: from pd9e394f2.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.148.242] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AvekJ-0005lv-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:45:19 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AvekD-0006wv-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:45:13 +0100
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:45:13 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: minor problems
Message-ID: <20040224154513.GB3000@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: Beta 2
uname -a: not available, see below
Date: 2004-02-24 15:00
Method: CD-Boot, installed from CD, additional packages installed from http mirror
Machine: Gericom Notebook
Processor: AMD K6-2
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
 /dev/hda1 /boot
 /dev/hda2 swap
 /dev/hda3 /
Output of lspci:
 not available, see below

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

After I installed the system sucessfully and worked a little bit on
it, the harddrive has started giving strange error messages and the filesystem
is totally f***ed up now. I believe this is a hardware problem though.
I only took the machine to try the installer. Haven't used it for a
year or two.

Here the problems during the install:

I use a pcmcia network card, but the PCMCIA bus was not correctly
configured (insmod of ds.o failed, because there was no socket driver
loaded), so the network didn't work. After the install I used modconf
to load the correct module and it worked. Don't know what the problem
exactly was.  I can give you a lspci output later if wanted.

I encountered some minor problems during the install process:
 While creating the filesystems, I selected /dev/hda1 and ext2 and
/boot. Then I selected /dev/hda2 (which was already a swap partition)
and "keep filesystem". After that /dev/hda1 and /dev/hda2 were both
marked as to be mounted on /boot

After the note about the reboot showed up a note about debconf
priorities, but I couldn't read it since the reboot was already
started. Somewhat confusing ;)

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234564-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 04:23:05 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue May 04 21:23:04 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLDw0-0000CX-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 21:23:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLDqA-0007e7-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:17:02 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 234564-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#234564: fixed in ddetect 0.94
Message-Id: <E1BLDqA-0007e7-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 00:17:02 -0400
Delivered-To: 234564-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: ddetect
Source-Version: 0.94

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ddetect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

archdetect_0.94_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.94_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.94.dsc
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.94.dsc
ddetect_0.94.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.94.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.94_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.94_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.94_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.94_all.udeb
hw-detect_0.94_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect_0.94_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 234564@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated ddetect package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  5 May 2004 00:01:13 -0400
Source: ddetect
Binary: hw-detect-full archdetect hw-detect ethdetect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.94
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description: 
 archdetect - Hardware architect detector (udeb)
 ethdetect  - Detect network hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect  - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect-full - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (full version) (udeb)
Closes: 234564 241467 247249
Changes: 
 ddetect (0.94) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Joey Hess
     - Find unavailable modules before calculating the size of the progress
       bar and stop displaying progress messages about skipping such modules.
       Closes: #241467
     - Made checking for already loaded modules O(n) instead of previous
       O(n^2).
     - Other speedups.
     - Never display "[Unknown]" as a module name in the selection list.
     - The airport test is good enough to not belong in get_manual_hw_info.
     - Ask the start_pcmcia qestion.
     - Mark the start_pcmcia question as translatable.
     - Only ask the question if pcmcia is not running (uses its pid file).
     - Restart cardmgr if it's already running to make sure it uses any modules
       that were not available before. Closes: #234564
     - Redirect fd 3 from /dev/null when starting pcmcia to avoid debconf fd
       hang issues.
   * Christian Perrier
     - Removed the double questioning in the pcmcia_start template
       Reworded the template for simplification
   * Kenshi Muto
     - Check module name includes '_' also by replacing '-' for Linux 2.6.
       Closes: #247249
   * Stephen R. Marenka
     - Add support for q40 and sun3(x) m68k subarchs.
   * Updated translations:
     - Bulgarian (bg.po) by Ognyan Kulev
     - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure
     - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
     - German (de.po) by Alwin Meschede
     - Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis
     - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
     - French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
     - Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
     - Hungarian (hu.po) by VER�K István
     - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
     - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu
     - Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
     - Norwegian Nynorsk (nn.po) by HÃ¥vard Korsvoll
     - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
     - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
     - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André Luís Lopes
     - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor
     - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann
     - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu
     - Turkish (tr.po) by Osman Yüksel
     - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
     - Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Carlos Z.F. Liu
Files: 
 6a03d4ce0158067dad4a5b4d036ad57d 767 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.94.dsc
 422f391b60e20055b6a699ad63451287 74947 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.94.tar.gz
 837c4d7c3293e6036272b5046aaebbe7 30770 debian-installer optional hw-detect_0.94_all.udeb
 973b5dccc14c85ff991e7813b6c86b52 18194 debian-installer optional ethdetect_0.94_all.udeb
 10f2bbc461d3bf26af996688425080b1 2536 debian-installer optional hw-detect-full_0.94_all.udeb
 24bef4ebc9fed6af19eb1a7b93842d61 2376 debian-installer standard archdetect_0.94_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAmGdb2tp5zXiKP0wRAv6QAJ9HIAEHYxh2qRv3eqjk0SoGb3SJmACffSwQ
kLUrubwP75RCGPtuAMYNuNc=
=s90D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: