[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225306: marked as done (debian-installer: cosmetic suggestions)



Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:51:56 -0700
with message-id <20040430035156.GB14770@tara>
and subject line Done!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2003 16:39:07 +0000
>From ejb@ql.org Sun Dec 28 10:39:06 2003
Return-path: <ejb@ql.org>
Received: from lakemtao04.cox.net [68.1.17.241] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AadgA-00033S-00; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:22:10 -0600
Received: from gwendolyn.in.ql.org ([68.100.32.28]) by lakemtao04.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20031228162210.YOTI19895.lakemtao04.cox.net@gwendolyn.in.ql.org>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:22:10 -0500
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (soup.in.ql.org [10.160.59.17])
	by gwendolyn.in.ql.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBSGM9Se014358
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:22:09 -0500
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBSGM8e6005578;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:22:09 -0500
Received: (from ejb@localhost)
	by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBSGM8eQ005574;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:22:08 -0500
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:22:08 -0500
Message-Id: <200312281622.hBSGM8eQ005574@soup.in.ql.org>
From: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: debian-installer: cosmetic suggestions
X-Debbugs-CC: ejb@ql.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
	autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: installation-reports
Version: unknown; see below

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 2003-12-27,
	http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/dvd/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i386-1.jigdo
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 2003-12-28, 10:50 a.m. EST
Method: booted from DVD 1

Machine: HP Omnibook 6100
Processor: Pentium III
Memory: 512 MB RAM
Root Device: IDE: 7.5 GB partition of 60 GB drive
Root Size/partition table:

   Disk /dev/hda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes
   240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7752 cylinders
   Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes

      Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
   /dev/hda1             1       145   1096168+  a0  IBM Thinkpad hibernation
   /dev/hda2   *       146       159    105840   83  Linux
   /dev/hda3           160      1108   7174440    7  HPFS/NTFS
   /dev/hda4          1109      7752  50228640    5  Extended
   /dev/hda5          1109      1871   5768248+  83  Linux
   /dev/hda6          1872      2912   7869928+  83  Linux
   /dev/hda7          2913      5246  17645008+  83  Linux
   /dev/hda8          5247      7580  17645008+   c  Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
   /dev/hda9          7581      7752   1300288+  82  Linux swap

   Configured d-i to leave /dev/hda2 intact and mount on /boot, create
   an ext3 file system on /dev/hda6 and mount on /, and to create swap
   on /dev/hda9.  All other partitions were left intact and not
   mounted.  (Of course, these were the /dev/ide0/... names...)

Output of lspci:

   00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset Host Bridge (rev 02)
   00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 02)
   00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
   00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 41)
   00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 01)
   00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 01)
   00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus Controller (rev 01)
   01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY
   02:03.0 Multimedia audio controller: ESS Technology ES1988 Allegro-1 (rev 12)
   02:04.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics LT WinModem (rev 02)
   02:05.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
   02:05.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
   02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VM (KM) Ethernet Controller (rev 41)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Note: uname -a run from shell in debian-installer; lspci and fdisk -l
run from Fedora Core 1 currently installed on the laptop.

A previous bug report elaborated on the error encountered installing
base system.  Here I'm just making a couple of minor suggestions.

In the screen that allows mounting and configuration of partitions,
the abbreviation "GiB" is used for gigabyte and "MiB" for megabyte.
Although GiB is somewhat understandable, MiB certainly isn't.  I'd
suggest the standard "GB" and "MB" would be more correct and probably
less confusing.

It would be nice if there were some visible feedback about which
partition was marked bootable, and more importantly, which partitions
are having new file systems created on them.  Alternatively or
additionally, the confirmation screen that says all indicated file
systems will be erased should indicate WHICH file systems are being
erased at that time.  I realize that this may complicate the system
because the data being displayed is no longer static, but I think
these enhancements are pretty important, especially given the
non-reversibility of the steps in question.

I'm looking forward to trying beta 2.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225306-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 03:51:57 +0000
>From scott@tranzoa.com Thu Apr 29 20:51:57 2004
Return-path: <scott@tranzoa.com>
Received: from mx-2.azc.com [64.213.38.231] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BJP48-0003Ca-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:51:56 -0700
Received: (qmail 27251 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 03:51:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tara) (216.254.27.160)
  by mx-2.azc.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 03:51:55 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:51:56 -0700
From: Scott Robinson <scott@tranzoa.com>
To: 225306-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Done!
Message-ID: <20040430035156.GB14770@tara>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 225306-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for your installation report!

224659 is done. Partman solves the issues.

Scott.

--=20
http://quadhome.com/            - Personal webpage
http://tranzoa.net/             - Corporate webpage

--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCRzVwACgkQfOrjFoFaMKIShwCgseXyHpzc27PhCSSjt3m7U8nU
YCMAoLujHTZ/aTs6UdusA4N55v3CfYNo
=W/vR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--



Reply to: