[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225930: marked as done (Integrity checks failing)



Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:02 -0700
with message-id <20040430040002.GB14846@tara>
and subject line Integrity checks failing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2004 23:52:37 +0000
>From jjramsey_6x9eq42@yahoo.com Fri Jan 02 17:52:27 2004
Return-path: <jjramsey_6x9eq42@yahoo.com>
Received: from web10704.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.212] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AcYrh-0007Lc-00; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:38:01 -0600
Message-ID: <20040102233801.80090.qmail@web10704.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [66.219.135.59] by web10704.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 15:38:01 PST
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 15:38:01 -0800 (PST)
From: "James J. Ramsey" <jjramsey_6x9eq42@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: jjramsey@pobox.com
Subject: Integrity checks failing
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=4.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports
Version: 20031231

Okay, *now* I'm doing the proper installation report
that I should have done before.

Debian-installer-version: From
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/,
dated 2003-12-31, used sarge-i386-netinst.iso  

Date: Morning of Jan. 1
Method: Booted sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Processor: AMD Athlon 1000MHz
Memory: 512MB


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =
didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

(Should be deja vu for those on the debian-boot
mailing list. Sorry.)

When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
netinst CD, not long after I did the language
selection, I got an error message like this:

"The integrity check for <FOO> failed. It is most
likely corrupt. Aborting."

After that, I was able to reboot and get back to my
old system.

<FOO> varies a bit. On one attempted install, it was
"base-installer"; on another "baseconfig-udeb"; on
still another "bterm-unifont." I thought the problem
might be DMA-related, because I have an older 8x
CD-ROM
that, though otherwise reliable, does screwy things
when DMA is enabled for it. However, starting the
install by typing "linux ide=nodma" at the "boot:"
prompt did not change anything.

I burned the sarge-i386-netinst.iso onto two different
CDs. Both yielded the same results.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225930-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 04:00:03 +0000
>From scott@tranzoa.com Thu Apr 29 21:00:03 2004
Return-path: <scott@tranzoa.com>
Received: from mx-2.azc.com [64.213.38.231] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BJPBy-00044R-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:02 -0700
Received: (qmail 28282 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 04:00:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tara) (216.254.27.160)
  by mx-2.azc.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 04:00:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:02 -0700
From: Scott Robinson <scott@tranzoa.com>
To: 225930-done@bugs.debian.org
Bcc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Integrity checks failing
Message-ID: <20040430040002.GB14846@tara>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 225930-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

package installation-reports
tags 225930 + moreinfo unreproducable
thanks

Thanks for your installation report!

I have similar hardware and was not able to reproduce this problem. That
said, you don't really give much of a description. ;-)

Furthermore, this was with a daily build. They are known to be broken
occassionally.

Please try this with the latest images available at:

http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

And e-mail back to 225930-reopen@bugs.debian.org if the problem still
exists.

Scott.

--=20
http://quadhome.com/            - Personal webpage
http://tranzoa.net/             - Corporate webpage

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCRz0IACgkQfOrjFoFaMKLY4gCdHMZn/s4Ks2b2pdu/W+PODKk0
kA4AoJZWKuu/uQNKISl5UW3bYGQ5tT9u
=88py
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--



Reply to: