[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#202684: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT: Fails for RAM <= 32MB)



Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:24:10 -0700
with message-id <20040430032409.GA14114@tara>
and subject line Done!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2003 11:08:42 +0000
>From max@dp0.mine.nu Thu Jul 24 06:08:39 2003
Return-path: <max@dp0.mine.nu>
Received: from pd9e77750.dip.t-dialin.net (dp0.mine.nu) [217.231.119.80] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19fdxf-0005WE-00; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:08:39 -0500
Received: by dp0.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id CA2EE4FDD4; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:10:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:10:00 +0200
From: Max Vozeler <max@hinterhof.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: INSTALL REPORT: Fails for RAM <= 32MB
Message-ID: <20030724110956.GA14085@dp0.mine.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: installation-reports
Version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso_23-Jul-2003
Severity: normal

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso (23-Jul-2003 16:15)
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-1-386 #3 Sat Mar 22 12:11:40 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: Thu Jul 24 12:32:23 CEST 2003
Method: Booted from CD

Machine: Bochs 2.0.2+20030525-1
Processor: Bochs i586 Emulation
Memory: 32MB/64MB (see below)
Root Device: Bochs IDE Emulation /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda1 (150mb,ext2) /; /dev/hda2 (50mb) swap
Output of lspci: Bochs has no PCI support

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E/O] (32MB/64MB)
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Debconf priority set to 'medium'

Issue0:
-------

The keyboard layout doesnt actually change if I select de-latin1-nodeadkeys
in kbd-chooser.


Issue1:
-------

I find the prompt for "Load Installer Modules" somewhat ambiguous. It
offers 'end' (q) and 'begin' (b). Its unclear that 'begin' is about
the list shown, not the actual context of the question: udeb installation.
I somehow expected 'begin' to start the installation and 'end' to abort it..

Maybe rename 'end' to 'finish' and 'begin' to eg. 'list begin'?


Issue2:
-------

Hardware detection didnt find Bochs' ne2000 NIC. Well, its ISA - so no
surprise here. Manual configuration works, but the installer will only offer
manual configuration after automatic configuration failed once and I choose
"Detect network hardware and load kernel drivers for it" the second time.


Issue3:
-------

With only 32MB RAM available (and less I suppose) the installation bails
out at the "Load Installer Modules" stage because of exhausted storage.
I didnt select any extra udebs for installation. 

The error mssages:

  Installing Debian installer modules
  tar: Short writeing nic-modules-2.4.20-1-386-udeb
  corrupted status flag!!
  tar: Short writeing parport-modules-2.4.20-1-386-udeb
  corrupted status flag!!
  tar: Short writeing kbd-chooser
  Cannot copy /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/kbd-chooser/postrm to /var/lib/dpkg/info/kbd-chooser.postrm: No space left on device

  Debian Installer Menu

  Failed to install module
  Installing the module kbd-chooser failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
  [Press enter to continue]
  <<PRESSING ENTER>>

  anna's postinst exited with status 2048
  Debian Installer Menu

  Choose the next step:
  Here is the main menu of the Debian installer
  fclose: No space left on device
  fclose: No space left on device
  fclose: No space left on device
  info: Trying to enable linux framebuffer
  modprobe: Can't locate module vesafb
  modprobe: Can't locate module vga16fb
  -ne
  -ne
  Segmentation fault
  -ne
  Segmentation fault

It then loops infinitly, repeating the lines starting from "info: Trying to
enable linux framebuffer". Here is whats available just after boot (I chose
shell from the first prompt):

  ~# free
              total     used     free    shared    buffers
    Mem:      30392    17208    13814         0        452
   Swap:          0        0        0
  Total:      30392    17208    13814

  ~# df
  Filesystem              1k-blocks       Used  Available  Use%  Mounted on
  rootfs                      15196       6184       9012   41%  /
  shm                         15196       6184       9012   41%  /

Installation went fine once I configured Bochs to provide 64MB of RAM. If
this is feasable at all I think we should try to get debian-installer 
working on systems with less RAM though..

Are eg. irda-modules, parport-modules really needed at this stage? Couldnt
those be installed later in the process when we have the final mountpoints
set up?

I also noticed that kbd-chooser was being installed although all keyboard
related configuration had already taken place.

...

Bochs is so slow its a PITA and tuntap networking didnt work for me, so
I couldnt do the base install with -businesscard.iso. I'll try again soon
with some real hardware :-)

Besides all that, very cool stuff!

Max

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202684-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 03:24:10 +0000
>From scott@tranzoa.com Thu Apr 29 20:24:10 2004
Return-path: <scott@tranzoa.com>
Received: from mx-2.azc.com [64.213.38.231] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BJOdG-0000kT-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:24:10 -0700
Received: (qmail 23694 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 03:24:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tara) (216.254.27.160)
  by mx-2.azc.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 03:24:09 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:24:10 -0700
From: Scott Robinson <scott@tranzoa.com>
To: 202684-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Done!
Message-ID: <20040430032409.GA14114@tara>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 202684-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for the installation reports!

The latest Debian installer images work just fine in under 32 megabytes of
memory.

Scott.

--=20
http://quadhome.com/            - Personal webpage
http://tranzoa.net/             - Corporate webpage

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCRxtkACgkQfOrjFoFaMKLdnQCfQH864dHug1yuCSPrE2biq43Y
hjcAoM6BYUwBfYOPXXC6CuyV600MnlpD
=+Kpr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--



Reply to: