Processed: handle install report
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 244963 -1
Bug#244963: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug 244963 cloned as bug 245162.
> reassign -1 discover-data
Bug#245162: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover-data'.
> retitle -1 Bad discover-data in testing
Bug#245162: Installation on thinkpad x40
Changed Bug title.
> severity -1 important
Bug#245162: Bad discover-data in testing
Severity set to `important'.
> tags -1 d-i
Bug#245162: Bad discover-data in testing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> merge -1 243448
Bug#245162: Bad discover-data in testing
Bug#243448: upgrading discover-data breaks betworking
Merged 243448 245162.
> clone 244963 -2
Bug#244963: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug 244963 cloned as bug 245163.
> reassign -2 noflushd
Bug#245163: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `noflushd'.
> retitle -2 postinst fails
Bug#245163: Installation on thinkpad x40
Changed Bug title.
> severity -2 serious
Bug#245163: postinst fails
Severity set to `serious'.
> clone 244963 -3
Bug#244963: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug 244963 cloned as bug 245164.
> reassign -3 base-config
Bug#245164: Installation on thinkpad x40
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
> retitle -3 Should be able to get high debconf priority even if there were problems in the installation
Bug#245164: Installation on thinkpad x40
Changed Bug title.
> tags -3 d-i
Bug#245164: Should be able to get high debconf priority even if there were problems in the installation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> merge -3 228839
Bug#245164: Should be able to get high debconf priority even if there were problems in the installation
Bug#228839: Should re-ask the debconf-priority question at the end of base-config
Merged 228839 245164.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: