Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
Sven Luther wrote:
> > How can it tell that base-installer is being treated differently
> > than other packages?
>
> Because it is an .udeb, and is originating from the debian-installer
> folk.
Right, but where do I see if it's an .udeb? Where is that information? The Sources and Packages files don't contain the extension.
> Probably just using a list of packages which are in the power of the d-i
> team would be enough, you could write the above stuff, and a warning
> that this is a d-i package, and thus gets handled manually ?
79 source packages have debian-boot@lists.debian.org listed as maintainer. Are all those banned from testing at the moment, or only a subset of them?
--
Björn
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#241847: 3rd of April, daily build powerpc-small root floppy broken
- From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.de>
- Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.de>
- Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.de>
- Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
- From: Björn Stenberg <bjorn@haxx.se>
- Bug#242021: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies)
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>