[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#214622: marked as done (Cut: command not found)



Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
with message-id <E1BAiit-0003Qw-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#214622: fixed in discover1 1.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2003 18:16:42 +0000
>From deego@socionomics.net Tue Oct 07 13:16:41 2003
Return-path: <deego@socionomics.net>
Received: from (socionomics.net) [12.166.244.34] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A6wO1-0008Ox-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:16:41 -0500
Received: from socionomics.net (deego@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by socionomics.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id h97IGbRX020595;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400
Received: (from deego@localhost)
	by socionomics.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id h97IGber020593;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400
Message-Id: <200310071816.h97IGber020593@socionomics.net>
From: "D. Goel" <deego@socionomics.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Cut: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: discover
Version: 1.5-1.1
Severity: normal

Whenevr i boot, i see a message something like this:

S15discover: cut: command not found.

All debian stable.

I do have textutils intalled.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux socionomics.net 2.4.20 #1 Thu Sep 18 13:12:19 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii  ash                           0.4.1      Compatibility package for the Debi
ii  debconf                       1.2.16     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-16   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdiscover1                  1.5-1.1    hardware identification library


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214622-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:14 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon Apr 05 22:09:14 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BAipl-0002db-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BAiit-0003Qw-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@yahoo.com>
To: 214622-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $
Subject: Bug#214622: fixed in discover1 1.5-8
Message-Id: <E1BAiit-0003Qw-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
Delivered-To: 214622-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 7 7

Source: discover1
Source-Version: 1.5-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz
discover1_1.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc
discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 214622@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow <david_nusinow@yahoo.com> (supplier of updated discover1 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  6 Apr 2004 00:06:52 -0400
Source: discover1
Binary: libdiscover1 discover1 libdiscover1-pic discover1-udeb libdiscover1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@yahoo.com>
Description: 
 discover1  - hardware identification system
 discover1-udeb - hardware identification library (udeb) (udeb)
 libdiscover1 - hardware identification library
 libdiscover1-dev - hardware identification library development files
 libdiscover1-pic - hardware identification library - static PIC version
Closes: 152604 160658 166460 178944 201695 213866 214622 220704 220936 221983 224634 238472 240308 241840 241841
Changes: 
 discover1 (1.5-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Petter Reinholdtsen
     - Add lspci(8) in SEE ALSO section of discover.8. (Closes: #213866)
     - Fix SMP CPU detection.  Patch from Thomas Poindessous. (Closes: #160658)
     - Make sure to install /usr/share/discover/linuxrc with execute
       bit set.  (Closes: #152604)
   * David Nusinow
     - Conflicts with libdiscover2; Closes: #241840
     - Translate hyphens to underscores in post-2.4 kernels in order to
       properly detect if they are loaded already
     - Use fantastic reworkings of init script to not require /usr to be
       mounted, as well as allowing multiple modules to be listed on a single
       skip line in discover.conf; Closes: #166460, #214622, #178944
     - skip i810-tco module by default in discover.conf. Also remove example
       foobar module line that was there previously. This keeps the discover
       database complete, which is preferrable; Closes: #238472
     - Check for /dev/sr in addition to /dev/scd; Closes: #201695, #221983
       Closes: #224634, #220936, #220704
   * Translations
     - Eddy Petrysor
       - Updated Romanian program translation (po/ro.po)
     - Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña
       - Added Spanish debconf translation (debian/po/es.po). (Closes: #240308)
     - Claus Hindsgaul
       - Updated Danish debconf translation (debian/po/da.po). (Closes: #241841)
Files: 
 0977505163084a28c70f7a6bb2b9b5ce 1451 admin optional discover1_1.5-8.dsc
 9d3ba7351c840e5ba566dd9e93e96cb4 89219 admin optional discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz
 bd752acc326cff7fb318ca779e16a51a 34174 debian-installer extra discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb
 581c963094a6b7a81c2860006a3e0243 78678 admin optional discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
 a64ad27564ef8091877da60ed975d7e7 82058 libs optional libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
 b123543a01ee4b35cb7bede2c12bd0be 61392 libdevel optional libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb
 9f41ed42c8ba4396bbc0dc86b5fb31b3 60326 libs extra libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=+3Nh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: