On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 07:27:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:55:03AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Jeremie Koenig wrote: > > > The plan was to request a sarge-ignore tag on the "d-i build-depends on > > > miboot, which is in contrib", and try to find a better solution for next > > > releases. > > > > This is the first I've heard of this. Has the sarge-ignore status of the > > GFDL docs really created such a slippery slope? I doubt it. > > Well, we had it in woody boot-floppies, it seems. Ignorance is not precedent. When we learn that non-free stuff is in main, our Social Contract obliges us to act on it, not immediately grandfather what we have found into our definition of "Free Software". -- G. Branden Robinson | Computer security is like an onion: Debian GNU/Linux | the more you dig in, the more you branden@debian.org | want to cry. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Cory Altheide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature