Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer

["C. Gatzemeier" <c.gatzemeier@tu-bs.de>]

Hi, 

I perfectly understand your reasoning, but frakly not quite the conlusion.

> We do not want a vast quantity of users with
> "sarge" in their sources.list, who will then be left without security
> updates and a trivial upgrade path when sarge+1 is released.

Yes, that's me ;-) I'd like my machine to stick with sarge when it is released 
as stable and not following testing anymore after that. (which will be 
sarge+1)


So I thought by specifying sarge now users will have the correct pointer now 
and then, without requirering manual change.

Christian