Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:34:43AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Well, yes, it's possible something messed up with /target, though it > > shouldn't. That should not have used more than 200 mb of memory though. > > tmpfs is mounted with an arbitrary size=100M, because it's otherwise too > small on systems with limited memory. Thanks, I'd forgotten about that. Ok, then, not having /target mounted could explain a full tmpfs here. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature