[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#231380: debian-installer: lilo installer fails when default devfs name(disc) is changed



Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #231380



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA

The following occurred with floppies, business-card iso and the 
netinstall iso.

I am not familiar with the devfs names but a peek (Alt-F2 ; mount)
suggested I could install lilo on a partition if I changed the default,
.../disc, to .../part5, for example. Although I was prompted to make the
partition active and accepted it, another peek (no lilo.conf) indicated
that the lilo installation appeared to have failed. I then found myself
at the menu with the grub install highlighted.  Trying to re-select lilo
install only returned me to the highlighted grub install.  If I finished
the install, of course the new installation would not boot as "other" in
my main lilo.conf.  There were no obvious messages indicating the
failure.  (A quick mount..., copy of a simple lilo.conf with initrd and a 
chroot /mnt lilo fixed that.)  Grub installs OK on a partition if you
give it the name of the partition it understands.

More generally, the new installer seems to offer dire warnings but not
much facility for arranging a dual boot machine.  If the defaults are
accepted the previously installed system (in my case Debian unstable)
was not accessible after rebooting as the admonishments suggested.

I pretended to be a novice and did not use the expert installation.  
I would have expected that a dual boot setup would be quite common 
and necessarily included for a novice intallation.

Hope this helps.  (it is my first effort at testing and reporting
problems with report -- nice system)



Reply to: