[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#236566: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)



Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:43:19 +0200
with message-id <20040316134318.GD9679@lml.bas.bg>
and subject line Bug#236566: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2004 03:39:25 +0000
>From apollock@caesar.andrew.net.au Sat Mar 06 19:39:25 2004
Return-path: <apollock@caesar.andrew.net.au>
Received: from dsl-203-113-235-229.act.netspace.net.au (caesar.andrew.net.au) [203.113.235.229] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Azp8O-0000T4-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 19:39:24 -0800
Received: from caesar.andrew.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by caesar.andrew.net.au (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i273dLtT013207
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:39:21 +1100
Received: (from apollock@localhost)
	by caesar.andrew.net.au (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) id i273dKic013204
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:39:20 +1100
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:39:20 +1100
From: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: INSTALL REPORT
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040307033920.GA13142@caesar.andrew.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 20040305 daily build
uname -a: 
Linux ditest 2.4.24-1-386 #1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Mar  7 13:49:21 EST 2004
Method: 
Booted from CDROM, installed onto a brand spanking new hard disk. All HTTP
access was transparently proxied.

Machine: Noname clone
Processor: Intel Pentium IV
Memory: 256M
Root Device: IDE, /dev/hdb1
Root Size/partition table:  

Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdb1               1          62      497983+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb2              63         124      498015   82  Linux swap
/dev/hdb3             125       14593   116222242+  8e  Linux LVM

Filesystem    Type     Size   Used  Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hdb1     ext3     494M    54M   416M  12% /
/dev/base/home
              ext3     2.2G    34M   2.0G   2% /home
/dev/base/tmp ext3     2.2G    34M   2.0G   2% /tmp
/dev/base/usr ext3     2.2G   134M   1.9G   7% /usr
/dev/base/var ext3     2.2G    91M   2.0G   5% /var
tmpfs        tmpfs     132M      0   132M   0% /dev/shm

Output of lspci:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev 12)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 12)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 12)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 12)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 12)
00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 12)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev b2)
03:00.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1370 [AudioPCI] (rev 01)
03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08)
03:02.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV23 IEEE-1394 Controller

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Looking good guys. This was an install run at medium priority, and the only
issue that I had was the first choice of partitioning was totally screwed, I
had to bail back to the main menu and choose the other partitioning option.

Slightly niggling issue was it seemed to do hardware detection at a lot of
steps, and actually presented some silly dialogs for detecting the networkd
device, for example. It included my CDROM drive in the list. In all instances
I just accepted the defaults and everything went swimmingly.

The issue with LVM appears to be resolved (lvmcfg now does install lvm10 and
friends into the new installation) and the fact that devfs is in the kernel but
devfs is not mounted does not seem to be an issue.

Cosmetically, I noticed that there's no graphical boot splash again :-(

The kernel choosing stuff selected a non 686 optimised kernel for me. I'm sure 
previous installs have selected a more appropriate kernel image.

Final nitpick is that in the base-config, when it came to selecting my mirror,
defaulted to the United States, even though I'd well and truly specified Iw
was in Australia by now. I think the timezone stuff worked well, other than
the fact that Canberra is omitted (no biggy, it is the same timezone as Sydney
I just don't live in Sydney).

Otherwise, all was good!

Andrew

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 236566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 13:38:15 +0000
>From anton@lml.bas.bg Tue Mar 16 05:38:15 2004
Return-path: <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B3Elr-00023a-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 05:38:15 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B3Eql-0004Is-00
	for <236566-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:43:19 +0200
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:43:19 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: 236566-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#236566: INSTALL REPORT
Message-ID: <20040316134318.GD9679@lml.bas.bg>
References: <[🔎] 20040307033920.GA13142@caesar.andrew.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040307033920.GA13142@caesar.andrew.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 236566-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Thanks a lot for your installation report.

On  7.III.2004 at 14:39 Andrew Pollock wrote:
> 
> Slightly niggling issue was it seemed to do hardware detection at a lot of
> steps, and actually presented some silly dialogs for detecting the networkd
> device, for example. It included my CDROM drive in the list. In all instances
> I just accepted the defaults and everything went swimmingly.

This question is not showed when the installer is run with high
priority.  One of the purposes of the medium and the low priorities is
to be used in case of hardware problems.  Thats why it seams better to
include wrong modules in the menu than to ommit the one necessary.

> The issue with LVM appears to be resolved (lvmcfg now does install
> lvm10 and friends into the new installation) and the fact that devfs
> is in the kernel but devfs is not mounted does not seem to be an
> issue.

I belive that now it is indeed and finaly resolved. :-)

> Cosmetically, I noticed that there's no graphical boot splash again :-(

There is already.

> The kernel choosing stuff selected a non 686 optimised kernel for
> me. I'm sure previous installs have selected a more appropriate
> kernel image.

We have just prepared a new beta3 release of our installer.  You are
welcome to try it and report if this problem still exists.  If it
exist, then please send us the contents of /proc/cpuinfo.

> Final nitpick is that in the base-config, when it came to selecting
> my mirror, defaulted to the United States, even though I'd well and
> truly specified Iw was in Australia by now.

You will receive a separate notification for this problem.

Thanks again.

Anton Zinoviev



Reply to: