[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#236914: Installation report (images from 7 March, i386)



> partman-auto: This machine didn't have free space on the hard disk, so
> when partman-auto showed its menu during the startup of the
> partitioner there were only two options: automatically partition the
> whole drive and custom partitioning.  The problem is that the default
> option was the automatical partitioning of the whole drive rather then
> the custom partitioning.

Hmm, is this a bug? It will lead to the whole drive being autopartitioned
in noninteractive installs, but that's arguably a good thing.

> partman: The smileys are invisible so I could not see which partition
> is used and how it is used.  This is because of missing characters in
> the loaded font.

You can add them to build/graphic.utf. I'd forgotten about those smileys..

> partman-partitioning: In order to free space for the new install I
> decided to resize an ext3 partition.  The operation finished
> successfuly but almost all the time the progress bar was at 0% and I
> didn't know when this (quiet long) operation would stop.

I assume you know about this one better than I. 

> partconf-mkfstab: the generated /target/etc/fstab didn't contain entry
> for the swap space.  Partman had generated correct file
> /var/lib/partconf/fstab.d/partman with swap space included, but in
> /target/etc/fstab the swap entry was omited.

This has been fixed in the meantime.

> base-installer: The default kernel image was 386.  This is a safe
> default, but a better had to be chosen (686 on this machine).

base-installer goes by /proc/cpuinfo, and looks for " Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4"*
before installing -686 kernels. You have a PII. I'm not sure why we don't 
use the -686 kernel on what the package description says its for:
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV. Seems like we should..

> base-installer: During the kernel download the message on the screen
> is "Installing the kernel ..." (or something like that).  The problem
> is that the download can be quiet slow, the user is not informed what
> is going on so he/she could think that the installer has crashed.

I agree, we need a second-order progress bar here, even if it's only a
"Downloading kernel (5%)" with an updating number.

> grub-installer: The generated boot menu included only the newly
> installed Debian system.  There was also another Debian installation
> on this machine and it was not included in the menu.  One possible
> place to discover the existing operating systems is partman because
> this is necessary for example in order to provide the user with the
> option to upgrade an existing Linux system (not necessary Debian).
> However there are many different boot-loaders, so we have to find how
> partman can make the information about the operating systems available
> to all boot loader installers.

Sounds like a good idea for further development. We have a *lot* of
complaints about grub not including entries for existing DOS operating
systems.

> /var/log/partman was about 250kB and could be even bigger.  This can
> be a problem on machines with small RAM.

Only the parts before swapon are a significant problem, but I agree that it
would be good to trim that down.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: