[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235398: Package: installation-reports



Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 28 Feb 2004, http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: didn't get that far
Date: 28 Feb 2004, 7 p.m. MST
Method: Installed using "net" option off of netinst CD. Tried using distro.ibiblio.org as the source. No proxy

Machine: Generic Desktop with ASUS P5A-B MB
Processor: AMD K6-2 500
Memory: 256 MB, SDRAM
Root Device: IDE, Western Digital 2.5 GB drive
Root Size/partition table: Don't have exact details but approximately
74 MB ext3 /boot
256 MB swap
2.2 GB ext3 /
Output of lspci: Not available

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Basically, it completely downloaded all of the packages and then died
when trying to extract either the "perl-base" package or one of the "ppp"
packages.  The installation log had the error:

  tar: Unrecognized file

It seems like the is a problem with one of these packages.  I tried several
different mirrors, but I always got the same result.  Otherwise, I really
liked the net-based install.

I did finally get something working on my machine, but the "linux" boot
option didn't work out fully. It died saying that one of the installer's
files was corrupted (unfortunately, I didn't write down which one).  So,
with the basic "linux" option (or just hitting Enter) the installation
didn't get very far---it died during the "Load installer modules" stage.

The option that seemed to work was the "linux DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium".
It seemed to have a minor problem that the installer complained that
a "modprobe" of an ide-related module didn't succeed (it seemed like
"disk-ide" or something like that).  Despite the problem, it seemed to
work pretty well.

Thanks for all of your efforts,

Paul Graham
======================
psgraham@losalamos.com





Reply to: