Bug#231635: marked as done (debian-installer: surviving dhclient prevents static IP (re-)configuration)
Your message dated Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:55:18 -0800
with message-id <20040227045516.GA15253@darjeeling>
and subject line netcfg: seems now fixed with latest versions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2004 23:58:58 +0000
>From Marc.Herbert@free.fr Sat Feb 07 15:58:58 2004
Return-path: <Marc.Herbert@free.fr>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ApcLi-0003rh-00; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:58:58 -0800
Received: from fcat.(none) (mutualite-3-82-67-66-29.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.66.29])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP
id BC99EC021; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:58:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 21494 invoked by uid 1000);
Sat, 07 Feb 2004 23:58:52 -0000
From: Marc Herbert <Marc.Herbert@free.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian-installer: surviving dhclient prevents static IP (re-)configuration
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 00:58:52 +0100
Message-Id: <1076198332.444326.21493.nullmailer@fcat.(none)>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-08
Severity: normal
In the default debconf priority, the installer eagerly graps a DHCP lease
without asking the user. If the user is not happy with this and wants to
go back and manually configure the network, then network re-configuration
silently fails.
My guess: this may come from a surviving DHCP client.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fcat 2.4.21-5-686 #1 Sun Aug 24 15:25:33 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231635-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2004 04:55:22 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Thu Feb 26 20:55:22 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Awa1y-0002QJ-00; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:55:22 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.203.34 with login)
by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 04:55:18 -0000
Received: from darjeeling (unknown [192.168.0.7])
by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AC52E1A1
for <231635-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Awa1u-0003yO-00
for <231635-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:55:18 -0800
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:55:18 -0800
To: 231635-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: netcfg: seems now fixed with latest versions
Message-ID: <20040227045516.GA15253@darjeeling>
References: <1077840019.234093.16626.nullmailer@fcat.(none)>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1077840019.234093.16626.nullmailer@fcat.(none)>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 231635-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:00:19AM +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> I have redone the exact same test, but with updated
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/initrd.gz
> (at this time), and this bug seems now fixed.
OK, then I'll close this bug. Thanks.
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=2e2U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--
Reply to: