Bug#227291: marked as done (mklibs: needs to handle symbols starting with . for sparc)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Feb 2004 18:38:45 -0500
with message-id <1076197125.1578.0.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org>
and subject line Bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 22:53:47 +0000
>From blarson@blars.org Mon Jan 12 16:52:50 2004
Return-path: <blarson@blars.org>
Received: from bleep.blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfvkB-0004mF-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:40:11 -0600
Received: from bounce.nat.blars.org (root@blars.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.3])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i0C6e6kO005089;
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:40:10 -0800
Received: from bounce.nat.blars.org (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bounce.nat.blars.org (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i0C6e5r6000615;
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:40:05 -0800
Received: (from blarson@localhost)
by bounce.nat.blars.org (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) id i0C6dbkF000594;
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:39:37 -0800
Message-Id: <200401120639.i0C6dbkF000594@bounce.nat.blars.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: mklibs: needs to handle symbols starting with . for sparc
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:39:36 -0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mklibs
Version: 0.1.14
Severity: important
Tags: patch d-i
(This is also part of bug 220640, but I'm separting it out to make it
a single-issue bug on the approprate package. Only important for now
until sparc d-i gets held up by it.)
With the distributed mklibs, debian installer gives the following error:
/bin/sh: relocation error: /bin/sh: symbol .urem, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined
in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
mklibs gets rid of .urem and possibly other symbols that are needed on
sparc. The following patch fixes mklibs to allow symbols that start
with a period.
If this is undesierable on other architectures, it should be made
architecture specfic.
This patch is a slight modification of one by Nick Lopez.
--- /home/blarson/src2/mklibs-0.1.14/mklibs.py 2004-01-01 13:50:55.000000000 -0800
+++ mklibs.py 2004-01-11 19:42:45.000000000 -0800
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
# Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
# 1: 000000012002ab48 168 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND strchr@GLIBC_2.0 (2)
symline_regexp = \
- re.compile("\s*\d+: .+\s+\d+\s+\w+\s+(\w+)+\s+\w+\s+(\w+)\s+(\w+)")
+ re.compile("\s*\d+: .+\s+\d+\s+\w+\s+(\w+)+\s+\w+\s+(\w+)\s+(\.?\w+)")
# Return undefined symbols in an object as a Set of tuples (name, weakness)
def undefined_symbols(obj):
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux bounce 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 18:10:47 EDT 2003 sparc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages mklibs depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.7-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii gcc 4:3.3.2-2 The GNU C compiler
ii python 2.3.3-4 An interactive high-level object-o
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227291-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2004 23:39:17 +0000
>From jbailey@raspberryginger.com Sat Feb 07 15:39:16 2004
Return-path: <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Apc2e-0002lo-00; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:39:16 -0800
Received: from hosts ([65.49.88.87])
by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id <20040207233618.SVCF181170.fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@hosts>
for <227291-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:36:18 -0500
Subject: Bug fixed
From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
To: 227291-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/HU3vuGDzJWErv/JRhl/"
Message-Id: <1076197125.1578.0.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 18:38:45 -0500
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID <jbailey01@rogers.com> at Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:36:18 -0500
Delivered-To: 227291-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
--=-/HU3vuGDzJWErv/JRhl/
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ah, sorry hadn't noticed this bug when I fixed this. I used a slightly
different fix, and it has been uploaded.
--=20
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
--=-/HU3vuGDzJWErv/JRhl/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAJXcE5M5hmdCYCpkRAsO2AJ44nS7AT8CR42GksyOCn8k0VjQ6egCdEUst
61GtMy+UosfFQGCwbZlQGUo=
=gddp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-/HU3vuGDzJWErv/JRhl/--
Reply to: