Bug#230444: marked as done (FWD: BETA2: Install Report)
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:57:52 +0100
with message-id <200401311357.52153.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
and subject line Bug#230444: FWD: BETA2: Install Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2004 23:38:07 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jan 30 15:38:07 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmiD9-0000R6-00; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:38:07 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-50.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B2B17E0D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3CEF16ECB2; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:45:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:45:51 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FWD: BETA2: Install Report
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040130234551.GH3742@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
--gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: installation-reports
=20
The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and,
according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the
BTS so it will not be lost.
----- Forwarded message from "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu> -----
=46rom: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>
Date: 21 Jan 2004 12:34:02 +0700
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: BETA2: Install Report
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5=20
* First of all, it is not easy to figure out; to where to send
this "report template". Please add an URL and or email contact
address to that template.
* I have tested on two systems: one is using an ASUS P4/533 MB;=20
the other one is using an old ASUS P5A-B board (Pentium 166/MMX).=20
*** BOTH works OK! ****
Note: the Pentium 166/MMX failed to boot the beta1 version
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-2003012/msg00041.html
* Suggestions:
There should be a mode between default and expert that asks if using:
- DHCP or Static IP addresses
- LILO, GRUB, or NEITHER
--=20
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org -- http://rms46.vLSM.org/ --
Fetch my GNUPG public key at http://rms46.vlsm.org/pgp/pub.txt ---
----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
see shy jo
--gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAGuyud8HHehbQuO8RArz0AJwIUadiKFZOmBvELZBJvyhE9997FwCgwDTd
VYYuLNyfyvdpZXbmxv7xxxU=
=DQsv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230444-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 12:54:13 +0000
>From simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch Sat Jan 31 04:54:13 2004
Return-path: <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmudY-0002rq-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 04:54:13 -0800
Received: from 80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch (80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.175.152])
by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id i0VCs6v7024556;
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:54:08 +0100
From: Simon =?iso-8859-1?q?H=FCrlimann?= <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
To: rms46@ui.edu, 230444-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#230444: FWD: BETA2: Install Report
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:57:52 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <[🔎] 20040130234551.GH3742@kitenet.net>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040130234551.GH3742@kitenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401311357.52153.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Delivered-To: 230444-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Am Saturday 31 January 2004 00:45 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and,
> according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the
> BTS so it will not be lost.
>
> ----- Forwarded message from "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu> -----
>
> From: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>
> Date: 21 Jan 2004 12:34:02 +0700
> To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: BETA2: Install Report
> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
>
> * First of all, it is not easy to figure out; to where to send
> this "report template". Please add an URL and or email contact
> address to that template.
You should report it as a bug. This is documented in the INSTALLATION.HOWTO.
This has been done by Joey Hess and this bug is now being closed.
> * I have tested on two systems: one is using an ASUS P4/533 MB;
> the other one is using an old ASUS P5A-B board (Pentium 166/MMX).
> *** BOTH works OK! ****
>
> Note: the Pentium 166/MMX failed to boot the beta1 version
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-2003012/msg00041.html
>
> * Suggestions:
> There should be a mode between default and expert that asks if using:
> - DHCP or Static IP addresses
> - LILO, GRUB, or NEITHER
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200401/msg02753.html
for some discussion about this.
Thanx for this installation report!
Simon
Reply to: